From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris J Arges <carges@cloudflare.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, william.kucharski@oracle.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] mm/filemap: handle large folio split race in page cache lookups
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 14:13:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aarVMrFptdXhHsX1@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aanYdvdJVG6f5WL2@casper.infradead.org>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 07:24:38PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 12:34:33PM -0600, Chris J Arges wrote:
> > We have been hitting VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_contains(folio, index)) in
> > production environments. These machines are using XFS with large folio
> > support enabled and are under high memory pressure.
> >
> > >From reading the code it seems plausible that folio splits due to memory
> > reclaim are racing with filemap_fault() serving mmap page faults.
> >
> > The existing code checks for truncation (folio->mapping != mapping) and
> > retries, but there does not appear to be equivalent handling for the
> > split case. The result is:
> >
> > kernel BUG at mm/filemap.c:3519!
> > VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_contains(folio, index), folio)
>
> This didn't occur to me as a possibility because filemap_get_entry()
> is _supposed_ to take care of it. But if this patch fixes it, then
> we need to understand why it works.
>
> folio_split() needs to be sure that it's the only one holding a reference
> to the folio. To that end, it calculates the expected refcount of the
> folio, and freezes it (sets the refcount to 0 if the refcount is the
> expected value). Once filemap_get_entry() has incremented the refcount,
> freezing will fail.
>
> But of course, we can race. filemap_get_entry() can load a folio first,
> the entire folio_split can happen, then it calls folio_try_get() and
> succeeds, but it no longer covers the index we were looking for. That's
> what the xas_reload() is trying to prevent -- if the index is for a
> folio which has changed, then the xas_reload() should come back with a
> different folio and we goto repeat.
>
> So how did we get through this with a reference to the wrong folio?
What would xas_reload() return if we raced with split and index pointed
to a tail page before the split?
Wouldn't it return the folio that was a head and check will pass?
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 18:34 [PATCH RFC 0/1] fix for large folio split race in page cache Chris J Arges
2026-03-05 18:34 ` [PATCH RFC 1/1] mm/filemap: handle large folio split race in page cache lookups Chris J Arges
2026-03-05 19:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-06 14:13 ` Kiryl Shutsemau [this message]
2026-03-06 16:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-06 18:36 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-03-06 18:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-03-06 20:20 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-03-06 20:11 ` Chris Arges
2026-03-06 20:21 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-03-06 20:58 ` Chris Arges
2026-03-23 16:35 ` Chris Arges
2026-03-30 11:02 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aarVMrFptdXhHsX1@thinkstation \
--to=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=carges@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=william.kucharski@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.