All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
To: razor@blackwall.org, idosch@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org
Cc: bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, v4bel@gmail.com,
	henrik.bjoernlund@microchip.com, horatiu.vultur@microchip.com,
	nikolay@nvidia.com, sd@queasysnail.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 12:02:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abDbPJ5nZ1u9fZRi@v4bel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abBgYT5K_FI9rD1a@v4bel>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 03:18:09AM +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> When a peer MEP is being deleted, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is called
> on ccm_rx_dwork before freeing. However, br_cfm_frame_rx() runs in
> softirq context under rcu_read_lock (without RTNL) and can re-schedule
> ccm_rx_dwork via ccm_rx_timer_start() between cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> returning and kfree_rcu() being called.
> 
> The following is a simple race scenario:
> 
>            cpu0                                     cpu1
> 
> mep_delete_implementation()
>   cancel_delayed_work_sync(ccm_rx_dwork);
>                                            br_cfm_frame_rx()
>                                              // peer_mep still in hlist
>                                              if (peer_mep->ccm_defect)
>                                                ccm_rx_timer_start()
>                                                  queue_delayed_work(ccm_rx_dwork)
>   hlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep->head);
>   kfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu);
>                                            ccm_rx_work_expired()
>                                              // on freed peer_mep
> 
> To prevent this, cancel_delayed_work_sync() is replaced with
> disable_delayed_work_sync() in both peer MEP deletion paths, so
> that subsequent queue_delayed_work() calls from br_cfm_frame_rx()
> are silently rejected.
> 
> The cc_peer_disable() helper retains cancel_delayed_work_sync()
> because it is also used for the CC enable/disable toggle path where
> the work must remain re-schedulable.
> 
> Fixes: dc32cbb3dbd7 ("bridge: cfm: Kernel space implementation of CFM. CCM frame RX added.")
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_cfm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_cfm.c b/net/bridge/br_cfm.c
> index 2c70fe47de38..118c7ea48c35 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_cfm.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_cfm.c
> @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static void mep_delete_implementation(struct net_bridge *br,
>  
>  	/* Empty and free peer MEP list */
>  	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(peer_mep, n_store, &mep->peer_mep_list, head) {
> -		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&peer_mep->ccm_rx_dwork);
> +		disable_delayed_work_sync(&peer_mep->ccm_rx_dwork);
>  		hlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep->head);
>  		kfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu);
>  	}
> @@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ int br_cfm_cc_peer_mep_remove(struct net_bridge *br, const u32 instance,
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  	}
>  
> -	cc_peer_disable(peer_mep);
> +	disable_delayed_work_sync(&peer_mep->ccm_rx_dwork);
>  
>  	hlist_del_rcu(&peer_mep->head);
>  	kfree_rcu(peer_mep, rcu);
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

CC'ing the Fixes patch authors and Sabrina, who is familiar with this bug pattern.


Best regards,
Hyunwoo Kim

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10 18:18 [PATCH net] bridge: cfm: Fix race condition in peer_mep deletion Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-11  3:02 ` Hyunwoo Kim [this message]
2026-03-12 15:35 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-03-13  1:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abDbPJ5nZ1u9fZRi@v4bel \
    --to=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=henrik.bjoernlund@microchip.com \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=v4bel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.