Re: [PATCH net-next] octeontx2-af: CGX: use kzalloc_flex for name

[Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>]

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 05:32:40PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Don't bother allocating separately. There's no good reason to do so for
> a small string like this.
> 
> Remove name kfrees as a result.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c     | 13 +++----------
>  .../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/lmac_common.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> index 4f33a816bc7a..0750fb696c90 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/cgx.c
> @@ -1725,14 +1725,10 @@ static int cgx_lmac_init(struct cgx *cgx)
>  		cgx->lmac_count = cgx->max_lmac_per_mac;
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < cgx->lmac_count; i++) {
> -		lmac = kzalloc_obj(struct lmac);
> +		lmac = kzalloc_flex(struct lmac, name, sizeof("cgx_fwi_xxx_yyy"));

Seems fine overall, I guess a minor nit is that I thought the typical style of
kzalloc_flex usage would be kzalloc_flex(*lmac, ....

idk if it's really worth a respin just for that, so:

Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>