All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Alejandro Olivan Alvarez <alejandro.olivan.alvarez@gmail.com>,
	1130336@bugs.debian.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression] Network failure beyond first connection after 69894e5b4c5e ("netfilter: nft_connlimit: update the count if add was skipped")
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2026 20:25:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abW2MAAqLnKZm3KF@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3cbfd15-acd1-4500-ba30-eac6f48523fb@suse.de>

Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de> wrote:
> On 3/14/26 5:13 PM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 3/14/26 3:03 PM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Control: forwarded -1
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/ regressions/177349610461.3071718.4083978280323144323@eldamar.lan
> > > Control: tags -1 + upstream
> > > 
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > In Debian, in https://bugs.debian.org/1130336, Alejandro reported that
> > > after updates including 69894e5b4c5e ("netfilter: nft_connlimit:
> > > update the count if add was skipped"), when the following rule is set
> > > 
> > >     iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m
> > > connlimit --connlimit-above 111 -j
> > > REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset
> > > 
> > > connections get stuck accordingly, it can be easily reproduced by:
> > > 
> > > # iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -m connlimit
> > > --connlimit-above 111 -j REJECT
> > > --reject-with tcp-reset
> > > # nft list ruleset
> > > # Warning: table ip filter is managed by iptables-nft, do not touch!
> > > table ip filter {
> > >          chain INPUT {
> > >                  type filter hook input priority filter; policy accept;
> > >                  ip protocol tcp xt
> > > match "connlimit" counter packets 0
> > > bytes 0 reject with tcp reset
> > >          }
> > > }
> > > # wget -O /dev/null
> > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-7.0-
> > > rc3.tar.gz
> > > --2026-03-14 14:53:51-- 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-7.0-
> > > rc3.tar.gz
> > > Resolving git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)... 172.105.64.184,
> > > 2a01:7e01:e001:937:0:1991:8:25
> > > Connecting to git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)|172.105.64.184|:443...
> > > connected.
> > > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently
> > > Location: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/
> > > linux.git/snapshot/linux-7.0-rc3.tar.gz
> > > [following]
> > > --2026-03-14 14:53:51-- 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/ git/torvalds/linux.git/snapshot/linux-7.0-rc3.tar.gz
> > > Reusing existing connection to git.kernel.org:443.
> > > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> > > Length: unspecified [application/x-gzip]
> > > Saving to: ‘/dev/null’
> > > 
> > > /dev/null                         [
> > > <=>                    ] 248.03M 
> > > 51.9MB/s    in 5.0s
> > > 
> > > 2026-03-14 14:53:56 (49.3 MB/s) - ‘/dev/null’ saved [260080129]
> > > 
> > > # wget -O /dev/null
> > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-7.0-
> > > rc3.tar.gz
> > > --2026-03-14 14:53:58-- 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/t/linux-7.0-
> > > rc3.tar.gz
> > > Resolving git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)... 172.105.64.184,
> > > 2a01:7e01:e001:937:0:1991:8:25
> > > Connecting to git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)|172.105.64.184|:443...
> > > failed: Connection timed out.
> > > Connecting to git.kernel.org
> > > (git.kernel.org)|
> > > 2a01:7e01:e001:937:0:1991:8:25|:443...
> > > failed: Network is unreachable.
> > > 
> > > Before the 69894e5b4c5e ("netfilter: nft_connlimit: update the count
> > > if add was skipped") commit this worked.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks for the report. I have reproduced
> > this on upstream kernel. I am working on it.
> > 
> 
> This is what is happening:
> 
> 1. The first connection is established and
> tracked, all good. When it finishes, it goes to
> TIME_WAIT state
> 2. The second connection is established, ct is
> confirmed since the beginning, skipping the
> tracking and calling a GC.
> 3. The previously tracked connection is cleaned
> up during GC as TIME_WAIT is considered closed.

This is stupid.  The fix is to add --syn or use
OUTPUT.  Its not even clear to me what the user wants to achive with this rule.

> +static inline bool tcp_syn_sent_or_recv(const struct nf_conn *conn)
> +{
> +	if (nf_ct_protonum(conn) == IPPROTO_TCP)
> +		return conn->proto.tcp.state == TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_SENT ||
> +		       conn->proto.tcp.state == TCP_CONNTRACK_SYN_RECV;
> +	else
> +		return false;
> +}

We're adding ever more complex checks in the conncount backend.
I don't like any of the solutions.

What about reverting the offending commit, at least for tree_count?
That way it continues to work as it did in the past.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-14 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-14 14:03 [regression] Network failure beyond first connection after 69894e5b4c5e ("netfilter: nft_connlimit: update the count if add was skipped") Salvatore Bonaccorso
2026-03-14 16:13 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-14 19:00   ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-14 19:25     ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-03-15  1:09       ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-18 12:49         ` Bug#1130336: " Salvatore Bonaccorso
2026-03-19  8:44           ` Alejandro Oliván Alvarez
2026-03-19  8:59             ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-04-22  9:18               ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-04-22 10:32                 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abW2MAAqLnKZm3KF@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=1130336@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=alejandro.olivan.alvarez@gmail.com \
    --cc=carnil@debian.org \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.