From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: jv@jvosburgh.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, sd@queasysnail.net,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, pabeni@redhat.com,
sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
razor@blackwall.org, idosch@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,1/4] net: use ndo_set_features to set offload features for bonding/bridge/team
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:02:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abdWiYhu4IOldqtE@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260315161943.1419237-1-horms@kernel.org>
On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 04:19:43PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index f48dc299e4b2..16b3fc620807 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -8920,6 +8920,9 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
> > __netdev_walk_all_upper_dev(upper_dev, __netdev_update_lower_level,
> > priv);
> >
> > + /* re-compute all features after adding link */
> > + netdev_change_features(upper_dev);
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > rollback:
>
> Can the feature computation skip updating ancillary fields when features
> don't change?
>
> The new architecture routes computation through netdev_change_features() ->
> __netdev_update_features() -> ndo_set_features(). However,
> __netdev_update_features() has this check:
>
> net/core/dev.c:__netdev_update_features() {
> ...
> if (dev->features == features)
> goto sync_lower;
>
Ah, yes. In the RFC patch set[1], I wanted to use a new ndo_update_offloads
callback to handle offload updates. But in the formal patch, I thought we
could avoid introducing a new callback and use ndo_set_features directly.
However, it looks like we need to fall back to ndo_update_offloads now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260226114208.27774-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com/
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 3:03 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: move netdev_compute_master_upper_features to ndo_set_features Hangbin Liu
2026-03-13 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: use ndo_set_features to set offload features for bonding/bridge/team Hangbin Liu
2026-03-15 16:19 ` [net-next,v2,1/4] " Simon Horman
2026-03-16 1:02 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-03-13 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] macsec: move netdev_upper_dev_link() after macsec_changelink_common() Hangbin Liu
2026-03-13 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] failover: use ndo_set_features for failover offload compute Hangbin Liu
2026-03-13 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: no need to disable LRO specifically Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abdWiYhu4IOldqtE@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.