From: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
To: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vineeth Karumanchi <vineeth.karumanchi@amd.com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@amd.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: macb: Protect access to net_device::in_ptr with RCU lock
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 09:27:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abit7VLwoy2ttEus@pek-khao-d3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DH4EHTJNY6GL.3EXTP61HNUNDD@bootlin.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2026 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 06:59:35PM +0100, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Hello Kevin,
>
> On Sun Mar 15, 2026 at 12:44 PM CET, Kevin Hao wrote:
> > @@ -5915,13 +5915,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused macb_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >
> > if (bp->wol & MACB_WOL_ENABLED) {
> > /* Check for IP address in WOL ARP mode */
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > idev = __in_dev_get_rcu(bp->dev);
> > if (idev)
> > ifa = rcu_dereference(idev->ifa_list);
> > if ((bp->wolopts & WAKE_ARP) && !ifa) {
> > netdev_err(netdev, "IP address not assigned as required by WoL walk ARP\n");
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> > +
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&bp->lock, flags);
> >
> > /* Disable Tx and Rx engines before disabling the queues,
> > @@ -5963,6 +5966,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused macb_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > tmp |= MACB_BFEXT(IP, be32_to_cpu(ifa->ifa_local));
> > }
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bp->lock, flags);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > /* Change interrupt handler and
> > * Enable WoL IRQ on queue 0
>
> Instead of making the RCU critical section extend so much, you could
> dereference ifa->ifa_local into a stack variable. In particular, it
> would avoid the RCU critical section covering a spinlock critical
> section.
I initially considered using a local variable before submitting this, as I also
believe that `ifa->ifa_local` is unlikely to be modified or freed in this
context. However, I ultimately decided to protect these sections with RCU for
the following reasons:
- It is logically more consistent to protect access to `ifa->ifa_local` with
RCU locking.
- For section already under spinlock protection, adding RCU locking introduces
negligible overhead, especially in a scenario like this.
That said, I do not have a strong preference for either approach. If you prefer
using a local variable to keep the RCU region shorter, I can prepare a v2 with
that change.
Thanks,
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 11:44 [PATCH net 0/2] net: macb: Fix two lock warnings when WOL is used Kevin Hao
2026-03-15 11:44 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: macb: Move devm_{free,request}_irq() out of spin lock area Kevin Hao
2026-03-16 18:11 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-17 1:25 ` Kevin Hao
2026-03-17 16:01 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-15 11:44 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: macb: Protect access to net_device::in_ptr with RCU lock Kevin Hao
2026-03-16 17:59 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-17 1:27 ` Kevin Hao [this message]
2026-03-17 15:54 ` Théo Lebrun
2026-03-18 6:31 ` Kevin Hao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abit7VLwoy2ttEus@pek-khao-d3 \
--to=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=harini.katakam@amd.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=vineeth.karumanchi@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.