From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] hsi: hsi_core: use kzalloc_flex
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 12:50:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abqGdAgB_WwaC6dx@venus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317195819.15496-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3933 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 12:58:19PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Simplifies allocations by using a flexible array member in this struct.
>
> Add __counted_by to get extra runtime analysis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: remove wrong null check
> drivers/hsi/hsi_core.c | 38 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
> include/linux/hsi/hsi.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hsi/hsi_core.c b/drivers/hsi/hsi_core.c
> index 7cb2dcb30fdb..001bcadf4b8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hsi/hsi_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hsi/hsi_core.c
> @@ -342,13 +342,11 @@ static void hsi_controller_release(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct hsi_controller *hsi = to_hsi_controller(dev);
>
> - kfree(hsi->port);
> kfree(hsi);
> }
>
> static void hsi_port_release(struct device *dev)
> {
> - kfree(to_hsi_port(dev));
Why is this free being removed? This is freeing hsi->port[i], which
still has an extra allocation after your patch.
FWIW - it should be possible to further simplify things (in a
potential follow-up patch) that also drops this extra
allocation/free by simply embedding an array of 'struct hsi_port'
instead of a pointer array in 'struct hsi_controller'.
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -446,7 +444,7 @@ void hsi_put_controller(struct hsi_controller *hsi)
> return;
>
> for (i = 0; i < hsi->num_ports; i++)
> - if (hsi->port && hsi->port[i])
> + if (hsi->port[i])
> put_device(&hsi->port[i]->device);
> put_device(&hsi->device);
> }
> @@ -462,39 +460,33 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hsi_put_controller);
> struct hsi_controller *hsi_alloc_controller(unsigned int n_ports, gfp_t flags)
> {
> struct hsi_controller *hsi;
> - struct hsi_port **port;
> unsigned int i;
>
> if (!n_ports)
> return NULL;
>
> - hsi = kzalloc_obj(*hsi, flags);
> + hsi = kzalloc_flex(*hsi, port, n_ports, flags);
> if (!hsi)
> return NULL;
> - port = kzalloc_objs(*port, n_ports, flags);
> - if (!port) {
> - kfree(hsi);
> - return NULL;
> - }
> +
> hsi->num_ports = n_ports;
> - hsi->port = port;
> hsi->device.release = hsi_controller_release;
> device_initialize(&hsi->device);
>
> for (i = 0; i < n_ports; i++) {
> - port[i] = kzalloc_obj(**port, flags);
> - if (port[i] == NULL)
> + hsi->port[i] = kzalloc_obj(**hsi->port, flags);
> + if (hsi->port[i] == NULL)
> goto out;
> - port[i]->num = i;
> - port[i]->async = hsi_dummy_msg;
> - port[i]->setup = hsi_dummy_cl;
> - port[i]->flush = hsi_dummy_cl;
> - port[i]->start_tx = hsi_dummy_cl;
> - port[i]->stop_tx = hsi_dummy_cl;
> - port[i]->release = hsi_dummy_cl;
> - mutex_init(&port[i]->lock);
> - BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&port[i]->n_head);
> - dev_set_name(&port[i]->device, "port%d", i);
> + hsi->port[i]->num = i;
> + hsi->port[i]->async = hsi_dummy_msg;
> + hsi->port[i]->setup = hsi_dummy_cl;
> + hsi->port[i]->flush = hsi_dummy_cl;
> + hsi->port[i]->start_tx = hsi_dummy_cl;
> + hsi->port[i]->stop_tx = hsi_dummy_cl;
> + hsi->port[i]->release = hsi_dummy_cl;
> + mutex_init(&hsi->port[i]->lock);
> + BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&hsi->port[i]->n_head);
> + dev_set_name(&hsi->port[i]->device, "port%d", i);
> hsi->port[i]->device.release = hsi_port_release;
> device_initialize(&hsi->port[i]->device);
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/hsi/hsi.h b/include/linux/hsi/hsi.h
> index 6ca92bff02c6..ea6bef9b6012 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hsi/hsi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hsi/hsi.h
> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ struct hsi_controller {
> struct module *owner;
> unsigned int id;
> unsigned int num_ports;
> - struct hsi_port **port;
> + struct hsi_port *port[] __counted_by(num_ports);
> };
>
> #define to_hsi_controller(dev) container_of(dev, struct hsi_controller, device)
> --
> 2.53.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-18 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 19:58 [PATCHv2] hsi: hsi_core: use kzalloc_flex Rosen Penev
2026-03-18 11:50 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abqGdAgB_WwaC6dx@venus \
--to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.