All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Lin YuChen <starpt.official@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, straube.linux@gmail.com,
	linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt()
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 15:46:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abvwIQh0CHTp4wNJ@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260319120737.29692-1-starpt.official@gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 08:07:35PM +0800, Lin YuChen wrote:
> This series refactors rtw_aes_decrypt() to improve code readability by
> reducing nesting levels through the use of guard clauses.
> 
> Changes in v3:
>  - Follow Dan Carpenter's suggestion to use direct returns (e.g., return
>    _SUCCESS or _FAIL) instead of "goto exit" for the newly introduced
>    guard clauses.
>  - Revert unrelated line-breaking and formatting changes to ensure the
>    patch remains focused strictly on the refactoring of indentation
>    levels, as advised by Dan.

Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>

You don't have to do this if you don't want, but unrelated to your
patch but the last two bytes of &le_tmp64 in rtw_BIP_verify() should
be initialized.  Just set it to zero at the start of the function.
Otherwise it's an uninitialized variable.

drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c:1308 rtw_BIP_verify() warn: not copying enough bytes for '&le_tmp64' (8 vs 6 bytes)

regards,
dan carpenter


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17 16:51 [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() to reduce nesting Lin YuChen
2026-03-18 15:56 ` Greg KH
2026-03-18 21:51   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() Lin YuChen
2026-03-18 21:51     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: use guard clause for AES check Lin YuChen
2026-03-19  7:59       ` Dan Carpenter
2026-03-19 12:07         ` [PATCH v3 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() Lin YuChen
2026-03-19 12:07           ` [PATCH v3 1/2] staging: rtl8723bs: use guard clause for AES check Lin YuChen
2026-03-19 12:07           ` [PATCH v3 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: use guard clause for stainfo check Lin YuChen
2026-03-19 12:46           ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2026-03-19 17:01             ` [PATCH v3 0/2] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() YuChen Lin
2026-03-18 21:51     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: rtl8723bs: use guard clause for stainfo check Lin YuChen
2026-03-19  7:58 ` [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: refactor rtw_aes_decrypt() to reduce nesting Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abvwIQh0CHTp4wNJ@stanley.mountain \
    --to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=starpt.official@gmail.com \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.