From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Venkat <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
vmolnaro@redhat.com, mpetlan@redhat.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com, Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com,
Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/test: Check for perf stat return code in perf all PMU test
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 16:48:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac2uvTXI1iknXwyV@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fWxDouXfCV3Xzk5JdouidUOaNqHBfZaf_c9JoEA8Ft-7g@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 01:40:47PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> This looks like a latent Intel cpu_atom PMU bug. Thomas, wdyt?
Are you ok with the change itself then?
I'm not sure what's the expectation when the test runs with a regular
user. I assume the intention of this change is running as root..
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-15 10:57 [PATCH] tools/perf/test: Check for perf stat return code in perf all PMU test Athira Rajeev
2026-03-23 10:39 ` Venkat
2026-04-01 20:40 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-01 23:48 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-04-01 23:57 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-02 15:45 ` Athira Rajeev
2026-04-03 1:27 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-04-02 17:32 ` Falcon, Thomas
2026-04-03 7:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-03 15:39 ` Ian Rogers
2026-04-07 0:48 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-15 6:25 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac2uvTXI1iknXwyV@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com \
--cc=Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com \
--cc=Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vmolnaro@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.