From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: kasong@tencent.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
David Stevens <stevensd@google.com>,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
Leno Hou <lenohou@gmail.com>, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Zicheng Wang <wangzicheng@honor.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] mm/vmscan: unify writeback reclaim statistic and throttling
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 19:39:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac3VV7h1fuDuUOJA@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260329-mglru-reclaim-v2-12-b53a3678513c@tencent.com>
On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 03:52:38AM +0800, Kairui Song via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Currently MGLRU and non-MGLRU handle the reclaim statistic and
> writeback handling very differently, especially throttling.
> Basically MGLRU just ignored the throttling part.
>
> Let's just unify this part, use a helper to deduplicate the code
> so both setups will share the same behavior. Also remove the
> folio_clear_reclaim in isolate_folio which was actively invalidating
> the congestion control. PG_reclaim is now handled by shrink_folio_list,
> keeping it in isolate_folio is not helpful.
>
> Test using following reproducer using bash:
>
> echo "Setup a slow device using dm delay"
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/tmp/backing bs=1M count=2048
> LOOP=$(losetup --show -f /var/tmp/backing)
> mkfs.ext4 -q $LOOP
> echo "0 $(blockdev --getsz $LOOP) delay $LOOP 0 0 $LOOP 0 1000" | \
> dmsetup create slow_dev
> mkdir -p /mnt/slow && mount /dev/mapper/slow_dev /mnt/slow
>
> echo "Start writeback pressure"
> sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/test_wb
> echo 128M > /sys/fs/cgroup/test_wb/memory.max
> (echo $BASHPID > /sys/fs/cgroup/test_wb/cgroup.procs && \
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/slow/testfile bs=1M count=192)
>
> echo "Clean up"
> echo "0 $(blockdev --getsz $LOOP) error" | dmsetup load slow_dev
> dmsetup resume slow_dev
> umount -l /mnt/slow && sync
> dmsetup remove slow_dev
>
> Before this commit, `dd` will get OOM killed immediately if
> MGLRU is enabled. Classic LRU is fine.
>
> After this commit, congestion control is now effective and no more
What do you mean by congestion control here?
> spin on LRU or premature OOM.
>
> Stress test on other workloads also looking good.
>
> Suggested-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
There is still differences for global and kswapd reclaim in the shrink_node()
like kswapd throttling and congestion state management and throttling. Any plan
to unify them?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-02 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-28 19:52 [PATCH v2 00/12] mm/mglru: improve reclaim loop and dirty folio handling Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] mm/mglru: consolidate common code for retrieving evitable size Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] mm/mglru: rename variables related to aging and rotation Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-30 1:57 ` Chen Ridong
2026-03-30 7:59 ` Baolin Wang
2026-04-01 0:00 ` Barry Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] mm/mglru: relocate the LRU scan batch limit to callers Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-30 8:14 ` Baolin Wang
2026-04-01 0:20 ` Barry Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] mm/mglru: restructure the reclaim loop Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-29 6:47 ` Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] mm/mglru: scan and count the exact number of folios Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-31 8:04 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-31 9:01 ` Kairui Song
2026-03-31 9:52 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] mm/mglru: use a smaller batch for reclaim Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-31 8:08 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] mm/mglru: don't abort scan immediately right after aging Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] mm/mglru: simplify and improve dirty writeback handling Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-29 8:21 ` Kairui Song
2026-03-29 8:46 ` Kairui Song
2026-03-31 8:42 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-31 9:18 ` Kairui Song
2026-04-01 2:52 ` Baolin Wang
2026-04-01 4:57 ` Kairui Song
2026-04-02 0:11 ` Barry Song
2026-04-07 2:52 ` Chen Ridong
2026-04-01 23:37 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-04-02 11:44 ` Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] mm/mglru: remove no longer used reclaim argument for folio protection Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] mm/vmscan: remove sc->file_taken Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-31 8:49 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] mm/vmscan: remove sc->unqueued_dirty Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-31 8:51 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-28 19:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] mm/vmscan: unify writeback reclaim statistic and throttling Kairui Song
2026-03-28 19:52 ` Kairui Song via B4 Relay
2026-03-31 9:24 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-31 9:29 ` Kairui Song
2026-03-31 9:36 ` Baolin Wang
2026-03-31 9:40 ` Kairui Song
2026-04-01 5:01 ` Leno Hou
2026-04-02 2:39 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-04-02 2:56 ` Kairui Song
2026-04-02 3:17 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-04-01 5:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] mm/mglru: improve reclaim loop and dirty folio handling Leno Hou
2026-04-01 7:36 ` Kairui Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac3VV7h1fuDuUOJA@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=lenohou@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=stevensd@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vernon2gm@gmail.com \
--cc=wangzicheng@honor.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.