From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, tools@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Askar Safin <safinaskar@zohomail.com>,
Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@redhat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] kernel/api: add debugfs interface for kernel API specifications
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 07:33:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acJ2gnnA9MP1wO_Z@laps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026032411-paramount-lapdog-41e6@gregkh>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 09:20:01AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 07:58:50PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > But this only works if the kabi stuff is built into the kernel image,
>> > right? This doesn't work if any of these abi sections are in a module
>> > or am I missing that logic here?
>>
>> That is correct, for now.
>>
>> I'm only trying to tackle syscalls to begin with, and since no syscalls live in
>> modules, we have no need for module support.
>
>We used to support syscalls in modules, but thankfully that is now gone.
>But, how will this work for stuff like usbfs ioctls? That is a module,
>and our uapi is, by far, in drivers through ioctl "hell" and that would
>be great to be able to document through all of this. Will that just not
>be in the debugfs api?
It will. I see it working just like how BTF or trace events do it now.
When a module loads, find_module_sections() extracts the .kapi_specs section
pointer and element count into new struct module fields. The COMING notifier
then iterates those specs, registers each via the existing kapi_register_spec()
dynamic registration path, and creates per-spec debugfs files under the
existing /sys/kernel/debug/kapi/specs/ directory. The kapi_list_show() function
is extended to also walk the dynamic_api_specs list (currently it only iterates
the static __start_kapi_specs..__stop_kapi_specs range). On GOING, all specs
owned by that module are removed from the list and their debugfs entries
cleaned up via debugfs_remove().
--
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-22 12:10 [PATCH v2 0/9] Kernel API Specification Framework Sasha Levin
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] kernel/api: introduce kernel API specification framework Sasha Levin
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] kernel/api: enable kerneldoc-based API specifications Sasha Levin
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] kernel/api: add debugfs interface for kernel " Sasha Levin
2026-03-23 13:52 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-23 23:58 ` Sasha Levin
2026-03-24 8:20 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-24 11:33 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2026-03-24 11:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-03-24 9:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] tools/kapi: Add kernel API specification extraction tool Sasha Levin
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_open Sasha Levin
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_close Sasha Levin
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_read Sasha Levin
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] kernel/api: add API specification for sys_write Sasha Levin
2026-03-22 12:10 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] kernel/api: add runtime verification selftest Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acJ2gnnA9MP1wO_Z@laps \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gpaoloni@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=safinaskar@zohomail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tools@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.