From: Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen <mvaralar@redhat.com>
To: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev,
Trilok Soni <trilok.soni@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] transport-mmio: Add v3, which polls for reset completion
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 19:44:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acV+cZ3jvru8BzIY@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260204115022.1930-2-peter.hilber@oss.qualcomm.com>
Hello Peter and sorry for the delay,
I used Claude to review it and I added some comments below:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 12:50:22PM +0100, Peter Hilber wrote:
> Let devices using the MMIO transport avoid stalling the driver (virtual)
> CPU during device reset, which requires introducing a new MMIO transport
> version.
>
> Unlike the PCI transport, the MMIO transport does not require the driver
> to poll for reset completion. This requires a device using the MMIO
> transport to complete reset during the write of 0 to the Status
> register. Device reset may take more than 100 ms if it involves
> terminating ongoing device activity which accesses driver memory. When
> the (virtual) CPU writing 0 to the Status register needs to be stalled
> during this, this may violate real-time requirements (including those
> for hypervisor trap-and-emulate).
>
> Address this by introducing a new MMIO transport version, v3, where the
> driver must poll for reset completion, and, hence, the device reset does
> not have to complete during the write to the Status register.
>
> For clarity, also add some related requirements for v2. These
> requirements are implied by the rest of the specification and therefore
> do not alter the v2 semantics.
>
> With MMIO transport v3, reset essentially works as with the PCI
> transport, and the change is therefore not expected to cause problems.
>
> Existing devices with MMIO transport v2 are not required to implement
> v3, which will not work with current drivers. Drivers have to support
> the MMIO transport versions of the used devices. Portable MMIO transport
> drivers should therefore support both v2 and v3, which is simple.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> transport-mmio.tex | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/transport-mmio.tex b/transport-mmio.tex
> index 94a93a1..6504a6b 100644
> --- a/transport-mmio.tex
> +++ b/transport-mmio.tex
> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ \subsection{MMIO Device Register Layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi
> }
> \hline
> \mmioreg{Version}{Device version number}{0x004}{R}{%
> - 0x2.
> + 0x2 or 0x3. With version 0x3, the driver waits until it reads 0 from the
> + \field{Status} register before considering a reset complete.
Shall we add something in the Status register too?,e.g., the driver may
or may not block when writing to this register.
> \begin{note}
> Legacy devices (see \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over MMIO / Legacy interface}~\nameref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over MMIO / Legacy interface}) used 0x1.
> \end{note}
> @@ -262,13 +263,29 @@ \subsection{MMIO Device Register Layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi
>
> The device MUST return 0x74726976 in \field{MagicValue}.
>
> -The device MUST return value 0x2 in \field{Version}.
> +The device MUST return value 0x2 or 0x3 in \field{Version}.
>
> The device MUST present each event by setting the corresponding bit in \field{InterruptStatus} from the
> moment it takes place, until the driver acknowledges the interrupt
> by writing a corresponding bit mask to the \field{InterruptACK} register. Bits which
> do not represent events which took place MUST be zero.
>
> +The device MUST reset when 0 is written to \field{Status}.
> +
> +While a reset is in progress, the device MUST retain the previous value of
> +\field{Status}.
I think this may be inconsistent with the `Device Status` section:
`The \field{device status} field starts out as 0, and is reinitialized to 0 by
the device during reset.`
I think we could change in this sentence the word `during` by `after`.
This is a minor comment though because in v2 `during` and `after` is the
same from driver pov due to the sync semantics.
> +
> +For \field{Version} 0x2, the device MUST finish a reset before the driver's
> +write of 0 to \field{Status} has completed.
> +
> +For \field{Version} 0x3, the device MAY continue with a reset after the driver's
> +write of 0 to \field{Status} has completed.
> +
> +For \field{Version} 0x3, when \field{Status} is 0, the device MUST ignore
> +further writes of 0 to \field{Status}.
> +
Is this coherent with PCI? I guess the idea is to ignore if the reset is
in progress but in that case status is not zero yet.
> +The device MUST present 0 in \field{Status} once it has finished the reset.
> +
> Upon reset, the device MUST clear all bits in \field{InterruptStatus} and ready bits in the
> \field{QueueReady} register for all queues in the device.
>
> @@ -305,7 +322,7 @@ \subsection{MMIO Device Register Layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi
> The driver MUST ignore a device with \field{MagicValue} which is not 0x74726976,
> although it MAY report an error.
>
> -The driver MUST ignore a device with \field{Version} which is not 0x2,
> +The driver MUST ignore a device whose \field{Version} is neither 0x2 nor 0x3,
> although it MAY report an error.
>
> The driver MUST ignore a device with \field{DeviceID} 0x0,
> @@ -331,6 +348,9 @@ \subsection{MMIO Device Register Layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi
> The driver MUST write a value with a bit mask describing events it handled into \field{InterruptACK} when
> it finishes handling an interrupt and MUST NOT set any of the undefined bits in the value.
>
> +For \field{Version} 0x3, the driver MUST NOT consider a reset complete before
> +reading back 0 in \field{Status}.
> +
> If VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET has been negotiated, after the driver writes 1 to
> \field{QueueReset} to reset the queue, the driver MUST NOT consider queue
> reset to be complete until it reads back 0 in \field{QueueReset}. The driver
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-04 11:50 [PATCH 0/1] transport-mmio: Add optional reset completion polling Peter Hilber
2026-02-04 11:50 ` [PATCH 1/1] transport-mmio: Add v3, which polls for reset completion Peter Hilber
2026-03-26 18:44 ` Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen [this message]
2026-03-27 18:26 ` Peter Hilber
2026-03-26 23:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-03-27 18:47 ` Peter Hilber
2026-03-10 12:32 ` [PATCH 0/1] transport-mmio: Add optional reset completion polling Peter Hilber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acV+cZ3jvru8BzIY@fedora \
--to=mvaralar@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.hilber@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=trilok.soni@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.