All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert de Bath <robert$@mayday.cix.co.uk>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [OT] I love Linux!
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 09:52:00 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acbcfe360cc41d35@mayday.cix.co.uk> (raw)

I thought you might be interested in this scrollback log, the complete
one is approx 17000 lines; I've no idea what caused the original problem;
hopefully something like a cosmic ray hitting a scsi transceiver.

> W1(robert)/$ ls -l  /disk/sda4
> total 184881842
> drwxr-xr-x    4 root     root         1024 May 11 18:44 boot
> dr--rwSrwT  15848 2962804722 2850042371 995903248 Jan 20  1959 lost+found
> W1(robert)/$ sudo umount /disk/sda4

> W1(robert)/$ sudo e2fsck /dev/sda4
> e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002)
> Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks...
> Superblock has a bad ext3 journal (inode 8).
> Clear<y>? yes

Hmmm.

>
> *** ext3 journal has been deleted - filesystem is now ext2 only ***
>
> /dev/sda4 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
> e2fsck: Illegal triply indirect block found while reading bad blocks inode
> This doesn't bode well, but we'll try to go on...
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Bad block inode has illegal block(s).  Clear<y>? yes

OMG!

>
> Illegal block #0 (1431276975) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #1 (673818087) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #2 (707372471) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #3 (608784174) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #4 (2312398709) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #5 (1548877642) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #6 (1635558748) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #7 (698739426) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #8 (1244206925) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #9 (3562494532) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #10 (1391372882) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #11 (1253673108) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #-1 (252663295) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #-2 (575818347) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #-3 (2336762341) in bad block inode.  CLEARED.
> Reserved inode 4 <The ACL data inode> has bad mode.  Clear<y>? yes
>
> Reserved inode 6 <The undelete directory inode> has bad mode.  Clear<y>?
> yes

Wimper wimper

> Illegal block #4 (704842913) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #5 (2746145280) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #6 (1448955905) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #8 (3877244673) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #9 (3309966792) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #10 (1437152980) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #11 (1498273102) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Too many illegal blocks in inode 1951.
> Clear inode? yes
>
> Restarting e2fsck from the beginning...
> /dev/sda4 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> i_faddr for inode 2 (/) is 2184181835, should be zero.
> Clear? yes
>
> i_frag for inode 2 (/) is 72, should be zero.
> Clear? yes
>
> i_fsize for inode 2 (/) is 46, should be zero.
> Clear? yes
>
> Entry 'lost+found' in / (2) has deleted/unused inode 11.  Clear? yes
>
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> /lost+found not found.  Create? yes
>
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Inode 2 ref count is 5, should be 4.  Fix? yes
>
> Inode 12 (...) has a bad mode (056231).
> Clear? yes
>
> Inode 13 (...) has a bad mode (075610).
> Clear? yes

Inode 2! Inode 12! Oh well there goes the data.

> Illegal block #4 (704842913) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #5 (2746145280) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #6 (1448955905) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #8 (3877244673) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #9 (3309966792) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #10 (1437152980) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Illegal block #11 (1498273102) in inode 1951.  CLEARED.
> Too many illegal blocks in inode 1951.
> Clear inode? yes
>
> Restarting e2fsck from the beginning...
> /dev/sda4 was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> i_faddr for inode 2 (/) is 2184181835, should be zero.
> Clear? yes
>
> i_frag for inode 2 (/) is 72, should be zero.
> Clear? yes
>
> i_fsize for inode 2 (/) is 46, should be zero.
> Clear? yes
>
> Entry 'lost+found' in / (2) has deleted/unused inode 11.  Clear? yes
>
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> /lost+found not found.  Create? yes
>
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Inode 2 ref count is 5, should be 4.  Fix? yes
>
> Inode 12 (...) has a bad mode (056231).
> Clear? yes
>
> Inode 13 (...) has a bad mode (075610).
> Clear? yet

Cringe!

...
17000 lines from the top.
> /dev/sda4: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****

No shit!

> /dev/sda4: 58/10040 files (12.1% non-contiguous), 15670/40131 blocks
> W1(robert)/$ sudo e2fsck -y -f /dev/sda4
> e2fsck 1.27 (8-Mar-2002)
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> /dev/sda4: 58/10040 files (12.1% non-contiguous), 15670/40131 blocks

Hey! 15Mb! That doesn't look bad.

> W1(robert)/$ sudo mount /dev/sda4 -r
> W1(robert)/$ ls /disk/sda4
> boot  lost+found

Oh my.

> W1(robert)/$ cd /disk/sda4
> W1(robert)sda4$ ls -l
> total 2
> drwxr-xr-x    4 root     root         1024 May 11 18:44 boot
> drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         1024 May 24 08:29 lost+found
> W1(robert)sda4$ cd boot
> W1(robert)boot$ ls -l
> total 13289
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       221502 Jun 25  2001 System.map-2.2.17
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       397485 Apr 14  2002 System.map-2.4.18-k6
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       437466 May  7 00:23 System.map-2.4.20
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       459497 May 11 00:48 System.map-2.4.20-05102308
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       424536 Mar 25 10:05 System.map-2.4.20-1-k6
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root          512 Dec 10  2000 boot.0300
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root          512 Sep 24  2000 boot.0800
> drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         1024 Sep 15  2002 bootdisk
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        37036 Apr 14  2002 config-2.4.18-k6
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        40107 May  6 23:23 config-2.4.20
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        40409 May 10 23:11 config-2.4.20-05102308
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root        39538 Mar 22 03:36 config-2.4.20-1-k6
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root      2736128 Sep 15  2002 initrd.img-2.4.18-k6
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root      2871296 May  7 07:22 initrd.img-2.4.20
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root      2887680 May  9 22:04 initrd.img-2.4.20-1-k6
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           17 May 11 18:44 initrd.img.old -> initrd.img-2.4.20
> -rw-------    1 root     root       163328 May 11 18:44 map
> -rwxrwxr-x    1 root     root          599 May 10 22:32 mklink
> drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root         1024 Sep 15  2002 old
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root           20 May  7 00:23 patches-2.4.20
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root           25 May 11 00:48 patches-2.4.20-05102308
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           23 May 11 18:44 vmlinuz -> vmlinuz-2.4.20-05102308
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       614313 Apr 14  2002 vmlinuz-2.4.18-k6
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       722227 May  7 00:23 vmlinuz-2.4.20
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       790421 May 11 00:48 vmlinuz-2.4.20-05102308
> -rw-r--r--    1 root     root       638232 Mar 25 10:05 vmlinuz-2.4.20-1-k6
> lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           14 May 11 18:44 vmlinuz-rd.old -> vmlinuz-2.4.20
> W1(robert)boot$

It's all there! Could this possibly mean ...

FX: diff, lilo, reboot, rumble, beep, rumble

> Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 mayday.local
> mayday login: _

Wow! I love Linux!

-- 
Rob.                          (Robert de Bath <robert$ @ debath.co.uk>)
                                       <http://www.cix.co.uk/~mayday>
Google Homepage:   http://www.google.com/search?btnI&q=Robert+de+Bath


             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-24  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-24  8:52 Robert de Bath [this message]
2003-05-25  1:53 ` [OT] I love Linux! Daniel Phillips
2003-05-25  9:03 ` Ryan Anderson
2003-05-25 19:47   ` Robert de Bath
2003-05-27  3:32 ` Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acbcfe360cc41d35@mayday.cix.co.uk \
    --to=robert$@mayday.cix.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.