From: Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>
To: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, hemantk@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, jhugo@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mhi: pci_generic: Ensure device readiness before starting MHI
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:48:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acdace3428d2850e6f5ecacc9888d2ca@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1613071507-31489-1-git-send-email-loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Hi Loic,
On 2021-02-11 11:25 AM, Loic Poulain wrote:
> The PCI device may have not been bound from cold boot and be in
> undefined state, or simply not yet ready for MHI operations. This
> change ensures that the MHI layer is reset to initial state and
> ready for MHI initialization and power up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
> ---
> v2: reset only if necessary
> v3: do not wait for MHI readiness in PBL context
>
> drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> b/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> index c20f59e..87abd7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/pci_generic.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #include <linux/timer.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> +#include "core/internal.h"
> +
> #define MHI_PCI_DEFAULT_BAR_NUM 0
>
> #define MHI_POST_RESET_DELAY_MS 500
> @@ -256,6 +258,7 @@ static int mhi_pci_claim(struct mhi_controller
> *mhi_cntrl,
> return err;
> }
> mhi_cntrl->regs = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[bar_num];
> + mhi_cntrl->bhi = mhi_cntrl->regs + readl(mhi_cntrl->regs + BHIOFF);
>
> err = pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, dma_mask);
> if (err) {
> @@ -391,6 +394,31 @@ static void health_check(struct timer_list *t)
> mod_timer(&mhi_pdev->health_check_timer, jiffies +
> HEALTH_CHECK_PERIOD);
> }
>
> +static void __mhi_sw_reset(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl)
> +{
> + unsigned int max_wait_ready = 100;
> +
> + if (MHI_IN_PBL(mhi_get_exec_env(mhi_cntrl))) {
> + /* nothing to do, ready for BHI */
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (mhi_get_mhi_state(mhi_cntrl) >= MHI_STATE_M0) {
> + dev_warn(mhi_cntrl->cntrl_dev, "Need reset\n");
> + writel(MHICTRL_RESET_MASK, mhi_cntrl->regs + MHICTRL);
> + msleep(10);
> + }
> +
> + while (mhi_get_mhi_state(mhi_cntrl) != MHI_STATE_READY) {
> + if (!max_wait_ready--) {
> + dev_warn(mhi_cntrl->cntrl_dev, "Not ready (state %u)\n",
> + mhi_get_mhi_state(mhi_cntrl));
> + break;
> + }
> + msleep(50);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int mhi_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
> pci_device_id *id)
> {
> const struct mhi_pci_dev_info *info = (struct mhi_pci_dev_info *)
> id->driver_data;
> @@ -451,6 +479,9 @@ static int mhi_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> goto err_unregister;
> }
>
> + /* Before starting MHI, ensure device is in good initial state */
> + __mhi_sw_reset(mhi_cntrl);
> +
> err = mhi_sync_power_up(mhi_cntrl);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to power up MHI controller\n");
> @@ -532,6 +563,8 @@ static void mhi_pci_reset_done(struct pci_dev
> *pdev)
> return;
> }
>
> + __mhi_sw_reset(mhi_cntrl);
> +
> err = mhi_sync_power_up(mhi_cntrl);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to power up MHI controller\n");
I have a set of changes coming in where you don't need to set BHI before
the
mhi_sync_power_up() call. I will be moving it to
mhi_prepare_for_power_up().
I will share the changes in the next patch series so you don't have to
set it.
Another thing I was thinking: we could expose a function to issue an MHI
RESET
so controllers have the freedom to use it if EE makes it possible.
This way we avoid the +#include "core/internal.h" and maintain a clear
distinction
between controller and core.
Thanks,
Bhaumik
---
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-11 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-11 19:25 [PATCH v3] mhi: pci_generic: Ensure device readiness before starting MHI Loic Poulain
2021-02-11 19:48 ` Bhaumik Bhatt [this message]
2021-02-12 1:41 ` Bhaumik Bhatt
2021-02-15 7:30 ` Loic Poulain
2021-02-16 17:37 ` Bhaumik Bhatt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acdace3428d2850e6f5ecacc9888d2ca@codeaurora.org \
--to=bbhatt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hemantk@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.