From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B794109B462 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1w7Yaj-0008QY-07; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:53:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1w7Yah-0008Q8-Fl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:53:07 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1w7Yag-0000Zp-1s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:53:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1774961585; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jE97nvbndYI6MVuXQLVsoswFUnylu5eF3Cm1HpjslSc=; b=dBoRMHvR5HSXHNPVLz6U37ryEFL4OH4iWCYvwcDaGi4U4cjJYztK9+Lb/ljQ2HtrwsaBog 6GHiZm0AoVGIBoIMbYssKWKfntWYAt13qwmF1TyqYv+2fDIIDgEfIKGe/baOjJTifLuufa Bd2HytiUdkKNDXaCgrPX2aStqMAv0y4= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-297-9E2sOo-vPkSrWT1dnigahg-1; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 08:53:03 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9E2sOo-vPkSrWT1dnigahg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 9E2sOo-vPkSrWT1dnigahg_1774961582 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A5018002CF; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.44.50.38]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD8319560AB; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:52:56 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: long.yunjian@zte.com.cn Cc: hreitz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mou.yi@zte.com.cn, liang.xianlong@zte.com.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: fix annotation Message-ID: References: <20260325094204300GFCZYBzAE00cSWaldbDcT@zte.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260325094204300GFCZYBzAE00cSWaldbDcT@zte.com.cn> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -5 X-Spam_score: -0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.54, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: qemu development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 25.03.2026 um 02:42 hat long.yunjian@zte.com.cn geschrieben: > From: Yunjian Long > > Some functions are defined in block_int-io.h, so the correct > annotation is block_int-io.h rather than block_int.h > > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Long Thanks, applied to the block branch. Kevin