From: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>,
<oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 121/130] tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h:427:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vasprintf'; did you mean 'vsprintf'?
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 14:00:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acy0ikxURKLJfTCf@rli9-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331112341.83f62d4d4de710457ecb59c1@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 11:23:41AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 11:27:20 +0200 kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-unstable
> > head: 24e341657c283c965e3bfee0baa9ed0376127973
> > commit: cc0b04b10a7b98fd8df2fd539177e94e0f83a5c3 [121/130] selftests: ksft_exit_fail_perror: support printf style arguments
> > config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311105.ysUeYPSZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260331/202603311105.ysUeYPSZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603311105.ysUeYPSZ-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> > Note: the akpm-mm/mm-unstable HEAD 24e341657c283c965e3bfee0baa9ed0376127973 builds fine.
> > It only hurts bisectability.
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > In file included from za-fork.c:12:
> > ../../kselftest.h: In function 'ksft_exit_fail_perror':
> > >> ../../kselftest.h:427:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vasprintf'; did you mean 'vsprintf'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > 427 | if (vasprintf(&buf, msg, args) == -1) {
> > | ^~~~~~~~~
> > | vsprintf
>
> What's going on here. vasprintf is a GNU thing, but that isn't it.
> kselftest.h includes stdio.h directly so fine. I don't see anything in
Sorry for the confusion, the build logic uses nolibc, which causes the wrong report.
I will do some learning to correct my knowledge for how to build the kselftests side
and update the bot.
FYI: below is the detail make command used
aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -fno-ident -s -Os -nostdlib \
-static -include ../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h \
-I../.. -ffreestanding -Wall tpidr2.c -o tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/tpidr2 -lgcc
In file included from tpidr2.c:6:
../../kselftest.h: In function 'ksft_exit_fail_perror':
../../kselftest.h:427:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vasprintf'; did you mean 'vsprintf'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
427 | if (vasprintf(&buf, msg, args) == -1) {
| ^~~~~~~~~
| vsprintf
> the later patches which could alter this, so the "only hurts
> bisectability" is inexplicable.
Sorry, you are right, this is a bug as well that the bisection does the wrong judgement,
and the same issue also in HEAD 24e341657c28 after manual check with this nolibc build.
I will look into the bug to fix it.
Thanks
>
> I was able to reproduce this, once. Now it's gone away.
>
>
> And arm64 allnoconfig is a nuisance. Now my vmlinux build immediately
> faceplants with
>
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:298:9: error: unknown type name 'u128'
> 298 | u128 full;
>
> With the latest 15.2.0 kit from https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/.
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 9:27 [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 121/130] tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h:427:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'vasprintf'; did you mean 'vsprintf'? kernel test robot
2026-03-31 18:23 ` Andrew Morton
2026-04-01 6:00 ` Philip Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acy0ikxURKLJfTCf@rli9-mobl \
--to=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chuhu@redhat.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.