From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FCE615B0EB; Wed, 29 May 2024 19:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717012598; cv=none; b=EK7VkyGMH9VQbCeN0M+l7wP5Q66jr+PN35oiTsxSM0Go4m3KedTM/a90DYpcFAQXKfNrESttgZzSvxRBdmHwtQ1KPa+B8GD9o17Wzxqz5Ggu7rT6fT0dJTrlfigisYGGi9VedPm2scaYqa6CI0ItVM2aSMbBPNXABybFKrkn3L8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717012598; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HXebE+uT07ix5cHeKB9Q/BIZhdYV52dqNDGCEf3QumY=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=ELgiTYE690ebrltaf3Nh1NsrhLY1O3rjBOz5SJ2/VbQ5mFAqBOUQio1nhjyOZSsmqiovuXgzb0hyEwidEO+JgxYmgUUtRf4PU4WOYgKNV5aV3aBEycKPdzPnvvpCbQFo3lwTeiljw1NZDWstu0QZbDN0EmSXwP/SfyTyLnEaweA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IEp5jvRb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IEp5jvRb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D3C3C113CC; Wed, 29 May 2024 19:56:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717012598; bh=HXebE+uT07ix5cHeKB9Q/BIZhdYV52dqNDGCEf3QumY=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=IEp5jvRbWU3vYXDWPIvPCdvg3mueZJ7g7Y61zqU++xNB0iXbardV4S+sXQ1eZtQzw fUq4y7ljpKhJEW8YD4phkmTVK29rmRUc9WL7nZR9Gkf9XEBCVlUxoNPYVf2t4oOiD7 I96KoFQ8n6myzgQ1Lulp9fK1YfVXU5/NspZCK0QxiCeiyfFFE5k6J9XYyW+U2G4yP4 1XdfE+ivvOvftncJi8QJa5PIkNjm63kk0KEGDdfCqxS4Blw0OI8mtpagVUm9p7D0tK SHGUVtEhrVIqdZYYjuVvgyTPD7rkTaC1pTQPx9iX9RZE+MypU7cDzzkejcgVMkQwBD gaSRAEPIWkhzg== Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <8da2c908f00043f05f7e26e3c26400aea0cfe8bc.1716975021.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> References: <8da2c908f00043f05f7e26e3c26400aea0cfe8bc.1716975021.git.geert+renesas@glider.be> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: renesas: rcar-gen2: Use DEFINE_SPINLOCK() for static spinlock From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Ye Bin , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Michael Turquette Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:56:36 -0700 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2024-05-29 02:35:10) > A static spinlock can be initialized automatically with > DEFINE_SPINLOCK() rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init(). >=20 > Suggested-by: Ye Bin > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd