From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavitra Jha <jhapavitra98@gmail.com>,
chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com, linux-wwan@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wwan: t7xx: validate port_count against message length in t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 15:17:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad4-bTbjtxbUXDU9@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b67dedb-3472-4322-9a30-32bf8e3cef99@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 11:41:54AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 4/11/26 10:39 AM, Pavitra Jha wrote:
> > t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler() uses the modem-supplied port_count field as
> > a loop bound over port_msg->data[] without checking that the message buffer
> > contains sufficient data. A modem sending port_count=65535 in a 12-byte
> > buffer triggers a slab-out-of-bounds read of up to 262140 bytes.
> >
> > Add a struct_size() check after extracting port_count and before the loop.
> > Pass msg_len from both call sites: skb->len at the DPMAIF path after
> > skb_pull(), and the captured rt_feature->data_len at the handshake path.
> >
> > Fixes: 1e3e8eb9b6e3 ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface")
>
> Wrong fixes tag:
>
> fatal: ambiguous argument '1e3e8eb9b6e3': unknown revision or path not
> in the working tree.
Interesting, there isn't a single digit correct here! The matching one
I'm finding based on the subject is:
39d439047f1d ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface")
Willy
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_port_ctrl_msg.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_port_ctrl_msg.c
> > index ae632ef96..d984a688d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_port_ctrl_msg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_port_ctrl_msg.c
> > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int fsm_ee_message_handler(struct t7xx_port *port, struct t7xx_fsm_ctl *c
> > * * 0 - Success.
> > * * -EFAULT - Message check failure.
> > */
> > -int t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler(struct t7xx_modem *md, void *msg)
> > +int t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler(struct t7xx_modem *md, void *msg, size_t msg_len)
>
> Undocumented new argument
>
> /P
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-11 8:39 [PATCH] net: wwan: t7xx: validate port_count against message length in t7xx_port_enum_msg_handler Pavitra Jha
2026-04-14 9:41 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-04-14 13:17 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2026-04-14 15:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Pavitra Jha
2026-04-14 16:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2026-04-15 8:47 ` [PATCH v3] " Pavitra Jha
2026-04-16 11:32 ` [PATCH v4] " Pavitra Jha
2026-04-21 8:25 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-04-23 15:07 ` [PATCH v5] " Pavitra Jha
2026-04-27 19:03 ` Simon Horman
2026-04-27 19:04 ` Simon Horman
2026-05-01 11:07 ` [PATCH v6] " Pavitra Jha
2026-05-06 2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-04-15 11:09 ` [PATCH v2] " kernel test robot
2026-04-15 13:37 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad4-bTbjtxbUXDU9@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=chandrashekar.devegowda@intel.com \
--cc=jhapavitra98@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wwan@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.