From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<magnus.karlsson@intel.com>, <stfomichev@gmail.com>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<larysa.zaremba@intel.com>, <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
<bjorn@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net 3/8] xsk: fix XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG issues
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 12:11:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adDjtUbNPSjffLSm@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403165636.1f4ee958@kernel.org>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2026 at 04:56:36PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2026 17:49:53 +0200 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > Currently xp_assign_dev_shared() is missing XDP_USE_SG being propagated
> > to flags so set it in order to preserve mtu check that is supposed to be
> > done only when no multi-buffer setup is in picture.
> >
> > Also, this flag has the same value as XDP_UMEM_TX_SW_CSUM so we could
> > get unexpected SG setups for software Tx checksums. Since csum flag is
> > UAPI, modify value of XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG.
>
> should we maybe add:
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG & XDP_UMEM_FLAGS_VALID)
>
> somewhere or use a hack like this ?
>
> #define XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG (XDP_UMEM_FLAGS_VALID + 1)
Good idea i'd lean towards the latter version. I can send v7 after easter
or if there wouldn't be other issues related to set maybe maintainer could
adjust it? ;)
>
> > diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> > index 23e8861e8b25..ebac60a3d8a1 100644
> > --- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> > +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > #include <net/sock.h>
> >
> > -#define XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG (1 << 1)
> > +#define XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG BIT(3)
> >
> > struct net_device;
> > struct xsk_queue;
> > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > index 37b7a68b89b3..729602a3cec0 100644
> > --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> > @@ -247,6 +247,10 @@ int xp_assign_dev_shared(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xdp_sock *umem_xs,
> > struct xdp_umem *umem = umem_xs->umem;
> >
> > flags = umem->zc ? XDP_ZEROCOPY : XDP_COPY;
> > +
> > + if (umem->flags & XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG)
> > + flags |= XDP_USE_SG;
> > +
> > if (umem_xs->pool->uses_need_wakeup)
> > flags |= XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP;
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-04 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 15:49 [PATCH v6 net 0/8] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-02 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 net 1/8] xsk: tighten UMEM headroom validation to account for tailroom and min frame Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-04 0:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-04 10:07 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-02 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 net 2/8] xsk: respect tailroom for ZC setups Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-02 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 net 3/8] xsk: fix XDP_UMEM_SG_FLAG issues Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-03 23:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-04 10:11 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2026-04-07 1:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-02 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 net 4/8] xsk: validate MTU against usable frame size on bind Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-04 0:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-04 10:02 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-06 18:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-02 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 net 5/8] selftests: bpf: introduce a common routine for reading procfs Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-02 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 net 6/8] selftests: bpf: fix pkt grow tests Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-02 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 net 7/8] selftests: bpf: have a separate variable for drop test Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-02 15:49 ` [PATCH v6 net 8/8] selftests: bpf: adjust rx_dropped xskxceiver's test to respect tailroom Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-04-07 1:50 ` [PATCH v6 net 0/8] xsk: tailroom reservation and MTU validation patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adDjtUbNPSjffLSm@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stfomichev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.