From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31BBB40DFC9; Mon, 6 Apr 2026 18:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775500426; cv=none; b=AAlVepeVA4cHHdm2Wrutz6NstQVPmTq84mVS0+mAjRAyf6M+4omnmcqhtVvePWbqDkXA1ZtGAJjTcdgPL5nvIOk9ahjpJCgjy6+GdHWQfrr7xNxoEQTr6Os9InkxwAX8KcogDbmLpgRhJq1JLn/qXH+CKQ7DyHFIVMOMImcof0g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775500426; c=relaxed/simple; bh=S4hIlqmESZzZKTl9wJpgwcDeCDqe8dmTf3YMZbGokvg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TUcVRV4Mk8rCYTp3LE1ZD8IJYvQ90Xfkucf54W3NQ4M003r579wGG0YGBZPISWM45/hHYEbGBQoSfGOp7vXxWpJ2Onb+q0yM6x5LPPc3NJ3fmq+lNzRNrkVuwPcRJdoFFaQVrLAtFVObpMf6F6VXPuCmRqoWQQIJLlgQ17UVod8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YaZAQ3ND; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YaZAQ3ND" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1775500425; x=1807036425; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=S4hIlqmESZzZKTl9wJpgwcDeCDqe8dmTf3YMZbGokvg=; b=YaZAQ3ND6QpS7qOfFIGRrQUGvlr1anlfAI0SMW3N8vSCwRbuN8YpDOoL jGTMuYZkHYLrYU57k9c3ob5/M4ThS/zF3oRl+9uzHDDsrP35pfHeflCij 1Q8cY2y6Cg2ic3EpLv3BIBKMLEtWKHB8ZqLtQOd2Nq9ZBu15GpiwcqQuf qY/rpuSMu2T3uSLz+9qzX94f0vMQZUM3SPucjouB4M40hRt/Vwz8Il8SO MoQat+1f2DKJlBCBbzWGmDJrI7znfE0LAxwXMLsrNpkVkum9NunzukA/e pfjn14FWuunyNBpxT/OgSqZZV/B7ps3IRpLbxTqcwafgg4WLGhxl7wLoV g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: OB/liYtwTCWCQmLENuXu4g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RPjHEW3kSZitFNBCYvgANw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11751"; a="76576919" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,164,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="76576919" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Apr 2026 11:33:44 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: JR/OIhDmSG68rqBoB4DjaA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Cm/nnFSSTRSV2vbLxsvOxQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,164,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="228212835" Received: from dalessan-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.73]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Apr 2026 11:33:42 -0700 Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 21:33:39 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sanjay Chitroda Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] iio: ssp_sensors: cleanup codestyle warning Message-ID: References: <20260406080852.2727453-1-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> <20260406080852.2727453-2-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260406080852.2727453-2-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Apr 06, 2026 at 01:38:48PM +0530, Sanjay Chitroda wrote: > From: Sanjay Chitroda > > Reported by checkpatch: > FILE: drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c > > WARNING: Prefer __packed over __attribute__((__packed__)) > +} __attribute__((__packed__)); Do we need __packed to be there in the first place? Isn't it naturally aligned? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko