All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	willemb@google.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next v2 2/3] selftests/net: Test PACKET_STATISTICS drops
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 09:29:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adPfTwbARPVFLys8@devvm20253.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.aa6e2a3e845d@gmail.com>

On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 11:08:15AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Joe Damato wrote:

[...]

> > @@ -396,6 +424,11 @@ static void run_test(void)
> >  
> >  	total_len = do_tx();
> >  
> > +	if (cfg_drop) {
> > +		check_packet_stats(fds);
> > +		goto out;
> > +	}
> 
> Sashiko pointed out

In the future, please link to the AI report.

> that there may be a race here between rx
> processing in the softirq and check_packet_stats. Seems plausible.

Can you elaborate why this is true?

I could be wrong, but I scanned the code and __local_bh_enable_ip seems to run
softirq synchronously in this case, so I think the code is correct.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-06 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-03 23:32 [net-next 0/3] Extend packet socket selftests Joe Damato
2026-04-03 23:32 ` [net-next v2 1/3] selftests/net: Test PACKET_STATISTICS Joe Damato
2026-04-03 23:32 ` [net-next v2 2/3] selftests/net: Test PACKET_STATISTICS drops Joe Damato
2026-04-04 15:08   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-04-06 16:29     ` Joe Damato [this message]
2026-04-06 18:37       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-06 21:20       ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-04-03 23:32 ` [net-next v2 3/3] selftests/net: Test PACKET_AUXDATA Joe Damato
2026-04-04 15:10   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-04-06 16:36     ` Joe Damato
2026-04-05  3:04   ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-04-05  3:30     ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-04-06 17:01       ` Joe Damato
2026-04-06 20:56         ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adPfTwbARPVFLys8@devvm20253.cco0.facebook.com \
    --to=joe@dama.to \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.