From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A957A3BB4A; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 05:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775625478; cv=none; b=dC3O7IERFjNI9jn4h9iY4KrpEeX2OxYAhjnCMPkrpmKHyFN0NmhshWymRB6xrvFgyUlfiWF3eLDWhkPKghUgGZQoVVaMNTXGxKxEEe85B4Vt725IvLOEZwjQj0ZIUMb4LzMWZaL6MrTQgowVbmgOYdRXzXBRvxh9mfZwkNT7XV0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775625478; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AvKsivDtHvgBw6YESEd969tQX9qxDI4tHJVTF9hUaOA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FaXN9qjyNLO1192BgaC62yIGmOH2i7trHwG2wDO7SBaM9JZa1As2WLpT8EaLRjpkwRG4WJ/gSJ0N5fgj0jt80dnlwZH3FJIXGMc8+BBNGCBFhXzxs7+WCUajadRrQQrgwDUAPXlhcNX+wv5BKE8tuTlhft7V1DeHYu9B8J3UHv0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=WyJc/fKW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=bombadil.srs.infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="WyJc/fKW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=2iO/eYli0MZ+1t9Myyo/dAixMD8J4gebm1v3LO7tDTU=; b=WyJc/fKW7z5rI6Fq1W6c5Fvi+f hR9wBm0jGGDSh1fYORDczeORWSs2NUVW7uZ9BMv0ujlDLrqnB2kD0oAjjWo8+1gK6PtsgUG80ek8N r1sQeHnGvJ4W3yF3/OkSJlee+NDdVzBUru5j7HhlU8pws8jjvV4yISvkIqcyRn/f/eZauVbX0rJe5 y74Hiian/bj4BRfGuR3H26tymaZCOtO+HKa4dYmy6cAJ5cXfpjWD/9JXRbm+XrF8g7Wpe6y1EJmvR W28tGoIIIPgisLg23EOqiYHHTH306zRBrfLx6DtF6S0K0OUjY9Bk3ZKEJIO5rLuRW28JsvRkhr8QA ZXkeGtcw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wALIU-00000008HXY-2Hap; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 05:17:50 +0000 Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 22:17:50 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Cc: Christoph =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=F6hmwalder?= , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lars Ellenberg , Philipp Reisner , linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] DRBD 9 rework Message-ID: References: <20260327223820.2244227-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 07:30:35PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/27/26 4:38 PM, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: > > As discussed (context: [0]), here is the first version of our DRBD 9 > > rework series, intended for for-next via for-7.1/drbd. > > Will you fixup the kerneldoc (nits) and the assigned-but-not-read > issues and send out a new version? Also looks this series doesn't > actually apply to for-7.1/block, patch 12 fails. Looks like all this went in without any review? Since when have we started these grand replacements anyway, as they are known to cause bugs and regressions? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) by mail19.linbit.com (LINBIT Mail Daemon) with ESMTP id 8B011160876 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2026 07:17:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 22:17:50 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] DRBD 9 rework Message-ID: References: <20260327223820.2244227-1-christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: Philipp Reisner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Lars Ellenberg , drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com List-Id: "*Coordination* of development, patches, contributions -- *Questions* \(even to developers\) go to drbd-user, please." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 07:30:35PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/27/26 4:38 PM, Christoph Böhmwalder wrote: > > As discussed (context: [0]), here is the first version of our DRBD 9 > > rework series, intended for for-next via for-7.1/drbd. > > Will you fixup the kerneldoc (nits) and the assigned-but-not-read > issues and send out a new version? Also looks this series doesn't > actually apply to for-7.1/block, patch 12 fails. Looks like all this went in without any review? Since when have we started these grand replacements anyway, as they are known to cause bugs and regressions?