All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Mashiro Chen <mashiro.chen@mailbox.org>
Cc: surenb@google.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+4b1bd55fba6260160779@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/psi: initialize *flags in psi_memstall_enter when PSI is disabled
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 11:10:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adZv1-U_JdY1Iv0H@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260405055044.554243-1-mashiro.chen@mailbox.org>

On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 01:50:44PM +0800, Mashiro Chen wrote:
> When PSI is disabled, psi_memstall_enter() returns early without
> writing to *flags, leaving the caller's local variable uninitialized.
> psi_memstall_leave() also returns early when PSI is disabled and does
> not read *flags, so the uninitialized value is never used functionally.
>
> However, KMSAN tracks the shadow and origin metadata per physical
> address. When a kernel stack page is subsequently reused, a new object
> at the same address inherits the stale KMSAN shadow from the old
> uninitialized pflags, causing spurious uninit-value reports in
> unrelated code paths such as __flush_smp_call_function_queue().
>
> Initialize *flags to 0 in the psi_disabled early-return path to
> prevent the stale shadow from escaping the callers' stack frames.

How is this not a kmsan bug?

I don't think putting an unexpected init into unrelated code with no
comment is an appropriate fix for what seems like a false positive in
this tool.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-08 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-05  5:50 [PATCH] sched/psi: initialize *flags in psi_memstall_enter when PSI is disabled Mashiro Chen
2026-04-08 15:10 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2026-04-08 16:14   ` Mashiro Chen
2026-04-08 16:40     ` Johannes Weiner
2026-04-08 16:58       ` Mashiro Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adZv1-U_JdY1Iv0H@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mashiro.chen@mailbox.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=syzbot+4b1bd55fba6260160779@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.