From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756769AbXEVEDc (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 00:03:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754962AbXEVEDZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 00:03:25 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:56841 "EHLO sj-iport-6.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754953AbXEVEDY (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2007 00:03:24 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.14,564,1170662400"; d="scan'208"; a="152465660:sNHT39703536" To: Rob Landley Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Status of squashfs? X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: <200705212352.17449.rob@landley.net> From: Roland Dreier Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:03:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200705212352.17449.rob@landley.net> (Rob Landley's message of "Mon, 21 May 2007 23:52:15 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2007 04:03:23.0496 (UTC) FILETIME=[244B6680:01C79C26] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So Fedora uses squashfs, Ubuntu uses, squashfs, Gentoo uses squashfs... It > seems like the only place I can get a kernel _without_ squashfs is > kernel.org. > > Is there a reason for this? Has anyone tried to merge it upstream? Do the squashfs developers want to merge it? - R.