From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
mchan@broadcom.com, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netif_tx_disable and lockless TX
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 21:13:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada3beq4yrn.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060531040307.GA6447@gondor.apana.org.au> (Herbert Xu's message of "Wed, 31 May 2006 14:03:07 +1000")
Herbert> However, lockless drivers do not take the xmit_lock so
Herbert> this method is ineffective. Such drivers need to do
Herbert> their own checking inside whatever locks that they do
Herbert> take. For example, tg3 could get around this by checking
Herbert> whether the queue is stopped in its hard_start_xmit
Herbert> function.
Yes, I had to add this to the IPoIB driver, because calling
netif_stop_queue() when the transmit ring was full was sometimes still
allowing hard_start_xmit to be called again:
/*
* Check if our queue is stopped. Since we have the LLTX bit
* set, we can't rely on netif_stop_queue() preventing our
* xmit function from being called with a full queue.
*/
if (unlikely(netif_queue_stopped(dev))) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->tx_lock, flags);
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
}
this bug started a long thread a while back, but I don't remember if
there was any resolution.
Herbert> I must say though that I'm becoming less and less
Herbert> impressed by the lockless feature based on the number of
Herbert> problems that it has caused. Does anyone have any hard
Herbert> figures as to its effectiveness (excluding any stats
Herbert> relating to the loopback interface which can be easily
Herbert> separated from normal NIC drivers).
I don't have exact figures at hand, but I remember something like a 2 or
3 percent throughput improvement for IPoIB.
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-31 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-31 4:03 netif_tx_disable and lockless TX Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 4:13 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 4:17 ` Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 4:13 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-31 4:51 Michael Chan
2006-05-31 4:58 ` Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 5:11 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 5:14 ` Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 6:26 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 6:31 ` Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 7:08 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 12:06 ` Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 12:36 ` jamal
2006-05-31 12:40 ` Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 13:03 ` jamal
2006-05-31 17:52 ` Robert Olsson
2006-06-02 3:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-06-02 10:46 ` Robert Olsson
2006-06-14 12:52 ` jamal
2006-05-31 21:20 ` Michael Chan
2006-06-01 0:09 ` David Miller
2006-06-01 0:25 ` Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 23:01 ` Michael Chan
2006-06-01 0:42 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-01 0:27 ` Michael Chan
2006-06-01 2:27 ` Herbert Xu
2006-05-31 5:30 Michael Chan
2006-05-31 5:33 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ada3beq4yrn.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.