From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: mlleinin@hpcn.ca.sandia.gov, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org,
shemminger@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: TSO and IPoIB performance degradation
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:34:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada4q29ra6t.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060307.172336.107863253.davem@davemloft.net> (David S. Miller's message of "Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:23:36 -0800 (PST)")
David> I wish you had started the thread by mentioning this
David> specific patch, we wasted an enormous amount of precious
David> developer time speculating and asking for arbitrary tests
David> to be run in order to narrow down the problem, yet you knew
David> the specific change that introduced the performance
David> regression already...
Sorry, you're right. I was a little confused because I had a memory of
Michael's original email (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/6/150) quoting a
changelog entry, but looking back at the message, it was quoting
something completely different and misleading.
I think the most interesting email in the old thread is
http://openib.org/pipermail/openib-general/2005-October/012482.html
which shows that reverting 314324121 (the "stretch ACK performance
killer" fix) gives ~400 Mbit/sec in extra IPoIB performance.
- R.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
openib-general@openib.org, shemminger@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Re: TSO and IPoIB performance degradation
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:34:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada4q29ra6t.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060307.172336.107863253.davem@davemloft.net> (David S. Miller's message of "Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:23:36 -0800 (PST)")
David> I wish you had started the thread by mentioning this
David> specific patch, we wasted an enormous amount of precious
David> developer time speculating and asking for arbitrary tests
David> to be run in order to narrow down the problem, yet you knew
David> the specific change that introduced the performance
David> regression already...
Sorry, you're right. I was a little confused because I had a memory of
Michael's original email (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/6/150) quoting a
changelog entry, but looking back at the message, it was quoting
something completely different and misleading.
I think the most interesting email in the old thread is
http://openib.org/pipermail/openib-general/2005-October/012482.html
which shows that reverting 314324121 (the "stretch ACK performance
killer" fix) gives ~400 Mbit/sec in extra IPoIB performance.
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-08 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-06 22:34 TSO and IPoIB performance degradation Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-06 22:40 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-06 22:40 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-06 22:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-06 22:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 3:13 ` Shirley Ma
2006-03-07 21:44 ` [openib-general] " Matt Leininger
2006-03-07 21:44 ` Matt Leininger
2006-03-07 21:49 ` [openib-general] " Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 21:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 21:53 ` [openib-general] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-07 21:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-08 0:11 ` [openib-general] " Matt Leininger
2006-03-08 0:11 ` Matt Leininger
2006-03-08 0:18 ` [openib-general] " David S. Miller
2006-03-08 0:18 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08 1:17 ` [openib-general] " Roland Dreier
2006-03-08 1:17 ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-08 1:23 ` [openib-general] " David S. Miller
2006-03-08 1:23 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08 1:34 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2006-03-08 1:34 ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-08 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-08 12:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-08 20:53 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-09 23:48 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-09 23:48 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-10 0:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-10 0:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-10 0:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-10 7:18 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-10 7:18 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-10 0:21 ` Rick Jones
2006-03-10 0:21 ` Rick Jones
2006-03-10 7:23 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-10 7:23 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-10 17:44 ` Rick Jones
2006-03-10 17:44 ` Rick Jones
2006-03-20 9:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 9:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 9:55 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-20 9:55 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-20 10:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 10:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 10:37 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-20 10:37 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-20 11:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 11:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 11:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-20 11:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-20 11:49 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-03-20 11:49 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-03-20 11:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-20 11:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-20 13:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 13:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 15:09 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-20 15:09 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-20 18:58 ` Rick Jones
2006-03-20 18:58 ` Rick Jones
2006-03-20 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-20 23:00 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-27 4:13 ` Troy Benjegerdes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ada4q29ra6t.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlleinin@hpcn.ca.sandia.gov \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openib-general@openib.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.