From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: [ofa-general] Re: mthca use of dma_sync_single is bogus Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 08:33:01 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20070709213913.GB20052@mellanox.co.il> <20070710071547.GA3814@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070710071547.GA3814@mellanox.co.il> (Michael S. Tsirkin's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:15:47 +0300") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Lukas Hejtmanek , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser , general@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > What makes you think dma_sync_single_range can't be used on memory mapped > by pci_map_sg/dma_map_sg? The fact that it's dma_sync_*SINGLE*_range, and that there's a separate dma_sync_sg() function defined in DMA-API.txt. - R.