From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server. Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:50:49 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20070202153531.18622.patches@notabene> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Andrew Morton , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCqNz-0000ic-Uj for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:50:56 -0800 Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1HCqO0-00055L-My for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:50:57 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20070202153531.18622.patches@notabene> (NeilBrown's message of "Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:39:36 +1100") List-Id: "Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: nfs-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6 support > in the NFS server. > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21. Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the NFS/RDMA tree and mainline Linux? In other words does this bring NFS/RDMA closer to merging? - R. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422962AbXBBEuw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:50:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423009AbXBBEuw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:50:52 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:9327 "EHLO sj-iport-6.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422962AbXBBEuv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:50:51 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,271,1167638400"; d="scan'208"; a="108117627:sNHT43266294" To: NeilBrown Cc: Andrew Morton , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 000 of 14] knfsd: Preparation for IPv6 support in NFS server. X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: <20070202153531.18622.patches@notabene> From: Roland Dreier Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:50:49 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20070202153531.18622.patches@notabene> (NeilBrown's message of "Fri, 2 Feb 2007 15:39:36 +1100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2007 04:50:49.0969 (UTC) FILETIME=[B5E5F610:01C74685] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > They are mostly from Chuck Level and make preparating for IPv6 support > in the NFS server. > They are *not* for 2.6.20, but should be ok for .21. Out of curiousity, does this patch series reduce the delta between the NFS/RDMA tree and mainline Linux? In other words does this bring NFS/RDMA closer to merging? - R.