From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH] opensm: fixing compilation issues in some header files Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:28:29 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4BAA34B2.9060808@dev.mellanox.co.il> <4C04F5E7.8030904@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20100601192205.GV28549@me> <4C057940.1020106@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20100602010314.GZ28549@me> <4C06084D.3070101@dev.mellanox.co.il> <20100602151806.GF28549@me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Hal Rosenstock's message of "Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:30:29 -0400") Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: Sasha Khapyorsky , Yevgeny Kliteynik , Linux RDMA List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > g++ can be used as a (better) C compiler. Shouldn't compilation with > g++ be supported ? g++ is not a C compiler. C++ is not just a superset of C The differences in the semantics of void* pointers are just one example; in addition C++ does not have designated initializers for structures, some valid C names are reserved words in C++, etc. - R. -- Roland Dreier || For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html