From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: ACPI Regression on Dell E1501 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:06:47 -0700 Message-ID: References: <467AE7E1.4050805@canonical.com> <467AF204.3060805@redhat.com> <1182462902.3316.105.camel@chaos> <467BC9F8.5000403@canonical.com> <467BCC3F.4080405@canonical.com> <1182525150.28514.746.camel@queen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1182525150.28514.746.camel@queen.suse.de> (Thomas Renninger's message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:12:30 +0200") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: trenn@suse.de Cc: Tim Gardner , Thomas Gleixner , Chuck Ebbert , lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org > pci=nomsi let the machine still boot. > > I tried a bit and I think I got it, for me it's this one: > > commit 78b7611c4a1e3ff008abc4751b566cb533d68f3d Really?? That's "msi: mask the msix vector before we unmap it" and A) it looks *really* obviously correct and B) it should only have an effect if a driver using MSI-X releases an IRQ. What testing did you do to pick out that change? Does your system work OK with just that patch reverted? - R.