From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
Cc: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define wc_wmb, a write barrier for PCI write combining
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:42:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adar75nlcar.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq08xrvhkee.fsf@jaguar.mkp.net> (Jes Sorensen's message of "28 Feb 2006 05:01:29 -0500")
Jes> Could you explain why the current mmiowb() API won't suffice
Jes> for this? It seems that this is basically trying to achieve
Jes> the same thing.
I don't believe mmiowb() is at all the same thing. mmiowb() is all
about ordering writes between _different_ CPUs without incurring the
cost of flushing posted writes by issuing a read on the bus. wc_wmb()
would just act like a true wmb(), even when using write-combining
regions on x86 -- in other words, there would be no cross-CPU synchronization.
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-28 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-25 4:20 [PATCH] Define wc_wmb, a write barrier for PCI write combining Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-25 4:43 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-25 7:34 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-25 13:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-25 17:20 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-25 19:01 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 17:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-28 17:50 ` Roland Dreier
2006-02-28 17:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-28 17:52 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 17:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-25 14:28 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-25 17:11 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-25 17:41 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-28 17:50 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 17:58 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-28 18:20 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 19:03 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-28 19:20 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 19:33 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-28 19:44 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-01 19:20 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-01 19:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-01 19:43 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-01 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-01 20:05 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-03-01 20:26 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-01 20:35 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 19:34 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-28 18:22 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-02-28 10:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-28 15:42 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2006-02-28 16:08 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-02-28 17:02 ` Roland Dreier
2006-02-28 17:13 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-28 17:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-03-01 8:16 ` Jeremy Higdon
2006-03-01 8:24 ` Jeremy Higdon
2006-02-28 17:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2006-02-28 17:57 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-02-28 18:07 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-28 18:24 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-03-01 10:45 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-03-01 17:04 ` Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adar75nlcar.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bos@pathscale.com \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.