From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4 Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:58:34 -0700 Message-ID: References: <452C7C1D.3040704@shaw.ca> <20061011103038.GK6515@kernel.dk> <452F053B.2000906@shaw.ca> <20061013080434.GE6515@kernel.dk> <45344F4D.6070703@shaw.ca> <45345015.2010601@rtr.ca> <45345B16.4090505@shaw.ca> <4535032F.2080807@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:47753 "EHLO sj-iport-6.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777AbWJQR6h (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:58:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4535032F.2080807@rtr.ca> (Mark Lord's message of "Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:22:07 -0400") Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Robert Hancock , Jens Axboe , Allen Martin , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, prakash@punnoor.de Mark> I was thinking more about the non wordsized fields, such as Mark> the various u8 bytes that gcc will lay out differently Mark> depending upon endianess. I don't know of any gcc version that changes the order of struct fields. You might be thinking of bitfields, which are laid out in an endian-dependent way. - R.