From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: openib-general@openib.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:30:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adazm3mqqh3.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070530080518.GA29195@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> (Bill Nottingham's message of "Wed, 30 May 2007 04:05:18 -0400")
thanks... I'm wondering if there's a consensus among kernel hackers
about changes like:
> - if (hdr.cmd < 0 || hdr.cmd >= ARRAY_SIZE(ucma_cmd_table))
> + if (hdr.cmd >= ARRAY_SIZE(ucma_cmd_table))
> return -EINVAL;
I understand that new gcc sees that hdr.cmd is unsigned and hence
can't be < 0, and generates a warning for that, and having a build
cluttered with warnings hides bugs and so on. However the code here
looks quite sensible to me -- otherwise we end up with missing range
checking if hdr.cmd ever changes to a signed type. This seems like a
good way to introduce bugs: delete valid range checking code to shut
up a silly gcc warning, and then change the type of a variable.
Can't we just make gcc shut up about the comparison and generate no
code for it because it knows it can't be true?
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-30 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-30 8:05 [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative Bill Nottingham
2007-05-30 15:30 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-05-30 15:41 ` dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative) Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 15:56 ` [ofa-general] Re: dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings Roland Dreier
2007-05-30 17:00 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 16:06 ` dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative) Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 19:00 ` dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings Tilman Schmidt
2007-05-30 19:14 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 19:09 ` dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative) Bill Nottingham
2007-05-30 19:23 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 20:48 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adazm3mqqh3.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openib-general@openib.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.