Re: [PATCHES perf-tools-next v6 0/8] Cleanups and fixes

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 07:20:31PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 02:31:55PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >         Here are some cleanups, a refresh for a patch Ian sent and fell
> > thru the cracks, using calloc where applicable, constify some arrays and
> > add a missing header that was making the build fail on some musl
> > systems.

> > 	This also adds checks for perf.data headers that were suggested
> > by sashiko.

> It seems sashiko keeps creating new issues or finding bugs.  As we
> discussed, I'd like to apply this series to fix known things first
> and we can address other issues separately.

Sure, please merge v6 as-is if you think it is ok and I'll come up with
follow up patches addressing more issues, for instance, here are some
more checks I'm writing with the help of Claude:

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c
index 22c44b6f0b098f95..2d23dbc666b676be 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c
@@ -2722,6 +2722,13 @@ static int process_nrcpus(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused)
 	ret = do_read_u32(ff, &nr_cpus_online);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
+
+	if (nr_cpus_online > nr_cpus_avail) {
+		pr_err("Invalid HEADER_NRCPUS: nr_cpus_online (%u) > nr_cpus_avail (%u)\n",
+		       nr_cpus_online, nr_cpus_avail);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	env->nr_cpus_avail = (int)nr_cpus_avail;
 	env->nr_cpus_online = (int)nr_cpus_online;
 	return 0;
@@ -3698,6 +3705,17 @@ static int process_cpu_domain_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused
 	nra = env->nr_cpus_avail;
 	nr = env->nr_cpus_online;
 
+	if (nra == 0 || nr == 0) {
+		pr_err("Invalid HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO: missing HEADER_NRCPUS\n");
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	if (ff->size < 2 * sizeof(u32) + nr * 2 * sizeof(u32)) {
+		pr_err("Invalid HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO: section too small (%zu) for %u CPUs\n",
+		       (size_t)ff->size, nr);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	cd_map = calloc(nra, sizeof(*cd_map));
 	if (!cd_map)
 		return -1;
@@ -3714,6 +3732,19 @@ static int process_cpu_domain_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * Sanity check: real systems have at most ~10 sched domain levels
+	 * (SMT, CLS, MC, PKG + NUMA hops). Reject obviously bogus values
+	 * from malformed perf.data files before they cause excessive
+	 * allocation in the per-CPU loop.
+	 */
+#define MAX_SCHED_DOMAINS 64
+	if (max_sched_domains > MAX_SCHED_DOMAINS) {
+		pr_err("Invalid HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO: max_sched_domains %u > %u\n",
+		       max_sched_domains, MAX_SCHED_DOMAINS);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
 	env->max_sched_domains = max_sched_domains;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
@@ -3725,6 +3756,11 @@ static int process_cpu_domain_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused
 			return -1;
 		}
 
+		if (cd_map[cpu]) {
+			pr_err("Invalid HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO: duplicate cpu %u\n", cpu);
+			return -1;
+		}
+
 		cd_map[cpu] = zalloc(sizeof(*cd_map[cpu]));
 		if (!cd_map[cpu])
 			return -1;
@@ -3760,7 +3796,13 @@ static int process_cpu_domain_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused
 			if (!d_info)
 				return -1;
 
-			assert(cd_map[cpu]->domains[domain] == NULL);
+			if (cd_map[cpu]->domains[domain]) {
+				pr_err("Invalid HEADER_CPU_DOMAIN_INFO: duplicate domain %u for cpu %u\n",
+				       domain, cpu);
+				free(d_info);
+				return -1;
+			}
+
 			cd_map[cpu]->domains[domain] = d_info;
 			d_info->domain = domain;