From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: greearb@candelatech.com
Cc: mark@mark.mielke.cc, cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 17:51:08 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adu9eo$rsr$2@main.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D029DAF.5040006@candelatech.com>
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 17:13:35 -0700
If you're talking per-socket SNMP counters, then that could work.
General protocol-wide counters would not help much, at least
in my case.
Why not? If you know where the drops are occurring, what else
do you need to know?
I'm not talking about per-socket SNMP counters, that would be
rediclious.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-09 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-06 19:37 RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets Chris Friesen
2002-06-07 3:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-07 15:34 ` Chris Friesen
2002-06-07 15:34 ` Chris Friesen
2002-06-07 22:15 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-07 22:15 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-08 21:05 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-08 23:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-08 23:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 0:13 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-09 0:13 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-09 0:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-10 4:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 4:34 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 5:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-10 5:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-10 6:08 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-10 6:08 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-10 12:03 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-10 12:03 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-10 12:18 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 12:18 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 12:24 ` jamal
2002-06-10 13:57 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-10 14:45 ` jamal
2002-06-10 14:56 ` jamal
2002-06-10 19:28 ` Chris Friesen
2002-06-10 19:28 ` Chris Friesen
2002-06-10 19:28 ` Chris Friesen
2002-06-10 19:28 ` Chris Friesen
2002-06-10 19:28 ` Chris Friesen
2002-06-10 18:44 ` David Ford
2002-06-10 18:50 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-10 19:02 ` David Ford
2002-06-11 22:41 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-06-11 22:41 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-06-12 3:41 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 3:41 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 3:57 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2002-06-12 5:20 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-12 5:20 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-12 6:08 ` Pekka Savola
2002-06-12 6:08 ` Pekka Savola
2002-06-12 6:26 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-12 6:26 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-12 6:32 ` Pekka Savola
2002-06-12 6:32 ` Pekka Savola
2002-06-12 6:49 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-12 6:49 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-12 12:11 ` Horst von Brand
2002-06-12 12:28 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-12 12:28 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-12 12:33 ` jamal
2002-06-12 12:44 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-12 12:44 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-12 12:44 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-12 12:44 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-12 13:00 ` jamal
2002-06-12 14:53 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-12 15:57 ` jamal
2002-06-12 15:57 ` jamal
2002-06-12 17:00 ` Horst von Brand
2002-06-12 17:00 ` Horst von Brand
2002-06-12 14:53 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-12 14:53 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-14 0:24 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-14 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2002-06-14 18:09 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-14 18:09 ` Ben Greear
2002-06-14 15:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2002-06-12 13:00 ` jamal
2002-06-12 14:52 ` john slee
2002-06-12 14:55 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-13 2:52 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-13 19:53 ` Horst von Brand
2002-06-13 7:21 ` David Schwartz
2002-06-13 8:44 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-13 10:10 ` David Schwartz
2002-06-13 10:10 ` David Schwartz
2002-06-13 8:44 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-13 7:21 ` David Schwartz
2002-06-23 2:03 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-23 2:03 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-23 2:05 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-06-12 12:11 ` Horst von Brand
2002-06-12 9:18 ` Sean Hunter
2002-06-12 9:18 ` Sean Hunter
2002-06-09 0:51 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-06-09 14:47 ` Pekka Pietikäinen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-12 20:30 Yan-Fa Li
2002-06-12 20:30 Yan-Fa Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='adu9eo$rsr$2@main.gmane.org' \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.