From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: validate cpumask_first() result in llc_populate_cpu_shard_id()
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:21:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adz4IVO4Ury-bu-S@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adk1CtVuElIw5bxo@slm.duckdns.org>
On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 07:36:10AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 03:42:00AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > @@ -8318,7 +8319,17 @@ static void __init llc_populate_cpu_shard_id(const struct cpumask *pod_cpus,
> > * The siblings' shard MUST be the same as the leader.
> > * never split threads in the same core.
> > */
> > - cpu_shard_id[c] = cpu_shard_id[cpumask_first(sibling_cpus)];
> > + leader = cpumask_first(sibling_cpus);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * sibling_cpus cannot be empty here since 'c'
> > + * is always set in it. This check silences a
> > + * compiler warning about using the unchecked
> > + * cpumask_first() result as an array index.
> > + */
>
> Can you add more details on the warning and update the patch desc
> accordingly?
Ack!
> This only triggers on UP configs, right?
yes, this only triggers on UP configs (like nios2) because on SMP
NR_CPUS > 1 and the compiler can't prove the index is out of bounds.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 8:49 [PATCH] workqueue: validate cpumask_first() result in llc_populate_cpu_shard_id() Breno Leitao
2026-04-10 9:00 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-10 10:42 ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-10 17:36 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-13 14:21 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adz4IVO4Ury-bu-S@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.