From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-183.mta0.migadu.com (out-183.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0083264D1 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 05:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.183 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784266146; cv=none; b=b4c+5kvpX736UQxRg0iexob/Pcb/uAcBzhDTyPYpRY+m8+gr6gUsX85ubeRbSqXeBesNX93yWR64u9DOv06xJc731NY6+gUFZ4DBsWRnObecbAu7EcbUZnCk0UmVldm6tE3FnOYiq0l6pzveRMX55Yg72VS+IrpOhQkhI/oa7HM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784266146; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UyKiW05dVXYoFQ4Ai8D5OcIFbFdmYd+XQyJ2dNyrYLQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=mZyi412zZQFA1PljybhR5Hvjr/jARZ1tfFOrMC8Ovxm2BCHclO7GVRaKy81etMeB/PIDRP+yLOsldE8dwrRsHzklUW15HyUQUrw8EoS48RUkLFBGD3KmaWl9Kl9bYwFRQ5NBpdymVqsOo3zVnuw4rWIZ79vbuf4lGyYSF/tCREo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=Z6g+u74T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="Z6g+u74T" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1784266130; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Y2nO73VJbZLJZXD8mdV6AAwLiCRSAIePc9vguBMw4As=; b=Z6g+u74TnVi4465cV97afGX2kKVoJSfKGw6ZaL4GnXEFj9qUYIvBr7AncmR3dfamwMBUKf jTz7p0W/8jKWT5ZbIEgGyNAVO9yfGDSA7/Se6rUY6vMV/qTYzkTZvSYwwjEbE1bKnosn28 npObmadLk0pqZZjlqTY0kq9sr3ijx/I= Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:28:37 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 1/9] bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in verifier To: Emil Tsalapatis , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , Quentin Monnet , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com References: <20260715153254.92010-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev> <20260715153254.92010-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Leon Hwang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 17/7/26 13:08, Emil Tsalapatis wrote: > On Wed Jul 15, 2026 at 11:32 AM EDT, Leon Hwang wrote: >> There are many adjacent blank lines in the verifier that have accumulated >> over time. >> >> Drop them for cleanup. >> >> No functional changes intended. > > > Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis Thanks for your review. > > What about the files we factored out of the verifier? E.g., backtrack.c > also has the same issue. Probably, I can post a patch to clean all adjacent blank lines in kernel/bpf/ when posting another series. Thanks, Leon > [...]