From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: dayou5941@163.com
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dlemoal@kernel.org, liyouhong@kylinos.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ata: ahci: fail probe if BAR too small for claimed ports
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 14:14:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae9TGoaQAi7dOVc0@ryzen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427060546.1407439-1-dayou5941@163.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 02:05:46PM +0800, dayou5941@163.com wrote:
> From: Youhong Li <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>
>
> When an AHCI controller is disabled in BIOS, its HOST_CAP register may
> contain invalid values (e.g., 0xFFFFFFFF) indicating an impossibly large
> number of ports. If CAP.NP claims more ports than can physically fit
> within the mapped BAR region, accessing port registers beyond the BAR
> boundary causes a kernel panic.
>
> Add validation in ahci_init_one() to check that the BAR size is
> sufficient for the number of ports claimed in CAP.NP. The check
> calculates the required MMIO size as:
>
> required_size = 0x100 (global registers) + max_ports * 0x80
>
> If required_size exceeds the actual BAR size, the probe fails with
> -ENODEV, preventing the panic and providing a clear error message.
>
> This solution follows the suggestion by Damien Le Moal and Niklas Cassel
> to detect and reject obviously broken controller configurations early.
>
> Reported-by: liyouhong <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>
> Suggested-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: liyouhong <liyouhong@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> v2:
> - Complete rewrite based on community feedback
> - Move check from libahci.c to ahci.c
> - Fail probe early instead of attempting to work around invalid state
> - Implement BAR size validation as suggested
>
> v3:
> - Fix patch format: add "---" separator and move changelog to correct location
> - Change dev_err to dev_warn as suggested
>
> v4:
> - Break long lines as suggested by Damien
> - Keep complete changelog history
>
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> index 1d73a53370cf..c04bee682605 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -1888,6 +1888,25 @@ static ssize_t remapped_nvme_show(struct device *dev,
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(remapped_nvme);
>
> +static int ahci_validate_bar_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, void __iomem *mmio)
static int ahci_validate_bar_size(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar, struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
> +{
> + u32 cap = readl(mmio + HOST_CAP);
readl(hpriv->mmio, HOST_CAP);
> + unsigned int max_ports = ahci_nr_ports(cap);
> + u32 last_port_end = 0x100 + (max_ports * 0x80);
> + resource_size_t bar_size =
> + pci_resource_len(pdev, AHCI_PCI_BAR_STANDARD);
pci_resource_len(pdev, bar);
> +
> + if (last_port_end > bar_size) {
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
> + "BAR5 too small for %u ports (last port ends at %u, BAR %llu)\n",
"BAR%d too small for %u ports (last port ends at %#x, BAR %pa)\n", bar,
> + max_ports, last_port_end,
> + (unsigned long long)bar_size);
Print resource_size_t as %pa instead of casting to unsigned long long
and pass bar_size by reference (&bar_size):
https://docs.kernel.org/core-api/printk-formats.html#physical-address-types-phys-addr-t
> + return -ENODEV;
return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> {
> unsigned int board_id = ent->driver_data;
> @@ -1988,6 +2007,10 @@ static int ahci_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> if (!hpriv->mmio)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + rc = ahci_validate_bar_size(pdev, hpriv->mmio);
Please let this function be called with the arguments:
ahci_validate_bar_size(pdev, ahci_pci_bar, hpriv);
Such that it takes the same arguments as ahci_remap_check().
Kind regards,
Niklas
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> /* detect remapped nvme devices */
> ahci_remap_check(pdev, ahci_pci_bar, hpriv);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 6:05 [PATCH v4] ata: ahci: fail probe if BAR too small for claimed ports dayou5941
2026-04-27 12:14 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-04-27 20:23 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-27 20:32 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-04-27 21:47 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-04-27 22:10 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae9TGoaQAi7dOVc0@ryzen \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dayou5941@163.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liyouhong@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.