All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	leo.bras@arm.com, leo.yan@arm.com,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	 paulmck@kernel.org, puranjay@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] arm64/irqflags: force inline of arch_local_irq_enable()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 07:37:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeY5e0Y3Ua2DoPxF@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeY02X5MDWPhGPCK@J2N7QTR9R3>

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 03:14:49PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 06:15:24AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 02:06:23PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > >
> > > Are you happy to try that?
> >
> > Absolutely, I'll work on testing it that and put together a patch
> > addressing all of them.
> >
> > Should this be targeted for stable backports as well? If so, which
> > commit should I reference in the Fixes tag?
>
> I don't think we need to worry about backporting, and can do this as a
> cleanup for now unless someone shouts that they're seeing brokenness in
> a stable kernel.
>
> There's no specific commit for a fixes tag; this has always been a bit
> dodgy, but we've evidently been getting away with it in practice.

Ack. I'll run this through production testing for approximately 24
hours, then submit the patch.

Thanks,
--breno


      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-20 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-20 12:42 [PATCH RFC] arm64/irqflags: force inline of arch_local_irq_enable() Breno Leitao
2026-04-20 13:06 ` Mark Rutland
2026-04-20 13:15   ` Breno Leitao
2026-04-20 14:14     ` Mark Rutland
2026-04-20 14:37       ` Breno Leitao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeY5e0Y3Ua2DoPxF@gmail.com \
    --to=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=leo.bras@arm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.