From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4C939C008 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776690066; cv=none; b=cSpQQlHZo7DYE3gQmwolsHcQan1/b/3WvcixLU7ATN23/E9V7ZopmLwW37kSrrF8MxIZqZtz2aBwrljuug0YkWYk30gT/5ZzKukSTHVA9cNnBXT+eMut2BPIzw1+PX7fmBwdevNiaQnTOlPiBcS0ZS0876TjY7rI61pBzBlgprw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776690066; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iK+dwfs6TTfXk/h7PczKlm40SXBtrA2IbQBGzgNFSkw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qa7oUU9/L5YYxe6mjWGhZcIwkCE7djRK2nxmqEtA9ioZs03/htoGW0J6WW7sU9BIUkU2AQCVhQ7gPP1VJhTZq/U82A4Gb09VK/Xg9AsdmAlVti7iJ/X5QxbIs/ovkrP5HhuRkCIKGiqXT/2x82+ei67tDLI/IAkob9fpt4g5tIA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=BCiadVmk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="BCiadVmk" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300271516; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 06:00:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e129823.arm.com (e129823.arm.com [10.1.197.6]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C43543F7B4; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 06:00:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1776690063; bh=iK+dwfs6TTfXk/h7PczKlm40SXBtrA2IbQBGzgNFSkw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BCiadVmkk/gq0W3CAiKpGOYi+LOoZbmvy1ddW8avimGJSFtvgSTnIVhbjkJffqUox /lwl7p5Mf5Qn+xAXQAzy6glLefm9pQZVFs5BWPVEois8neHP8utP6ztcI7UFKUXOcr ACneYNTOtEdZKvniPmdSbMHdVAwUr82NOwtr2gXc= Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:00:57 +0100 From: Yeoreum Yun To: Sebastian Ene Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, eric.snowberg@oracle.com, peterhuewe@gmx.de, jarkko@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, sudeep.holla@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] firmware: arm_ffa: check pkvm initailised when initailise ffa driver Message-ID: References: <20260417175759.3191279-1-yeoreum.yun@arm.com> <20260417175759.3191279-5-yeoreum.yun@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Sebastian, > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 06:57:59PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote: > > Hello Yeoreum, > > > > When pKVM is enabled, the FF-A driver must be initialized after pKVM. > > Otherwise, pKVM cannot negotiate the FF-A version or > > obtain RX/TX buffer information, leading to failures in FF-A calls. > > At the moment this already happens after you move back ffa_init() to > device_initcall(). How? the kvm_arm_init() is device_initcall() if both built as built-in. > > > > > During FF-A driver initialization, check whether pKVM has been initialized. > > If not, defer probing of the FF-A driver. > > > > I don't think you need to add this dependency. pKVM is > installed through KVM's module_init() which ends up calling hyp_ffa_init() to > do the proxy initialization. The ARM-FFA driver comes after it (since > pKVM is arch specific code). We don't have to call finalize_pkvm(..) to > be able to handle smc(FF-A) calls in the hyp-proxy. > As Marc said, the before finalised_pkvm(), smc wouldn't be trapped to pKVM. IOW, in case when both built as built-in, if ffa_init() is called before finalised_pkvm(), it couldn't proxy the FFA_VERSION, FFA_RXTX_MAP and FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET called by ffa_init(). How can you gurantee hyp_ffa_init() which is called by kvm_arm_init() comes first even kvm_arm_init() and ffa_init() are on device_initcall? [...] Thanks -- Sincerely, Yeoreum Yun