From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel: Add support for (possibly)
	unsynchronized maps.
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:16:06 +0000
Message-ID: <aefc95$3aiv1l@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
References: <1330142003-570-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net>
	<20120225110007.GA4222@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3F69F500
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:17:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20120225110007.GA4222@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:00:07 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> - in my pwrite experience, writing through cpu maps beats writing through
>   the gtt on llc machines. This has the added benefit that it reduces
>   pressure on the mappable gtt. Have you tried that, too?

Speaking of which, those wonderful pwrite patches are still MIA?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre