From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/i2c: Convert from using
	GMBUS1 + reg_offset idiom to reg + 0
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:22:55 +0100
Message-ID: <aefc95$q1pep@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>
References: <1305235044-9159-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1305235044-9159-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<yunfwoj8mb9.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<72a37e$j4eltu@orsmga002.jf.intel.com>
	<yunliya7ihz.fsf@aiko.keithp.com> <yunoc2eprdd.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<f80fcd$cmrjg@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
	<yun7h7m9gjx.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC2A9E9D3
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <yun7h7m9gjx.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:33:22 -0700, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 00:09:29 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > I need to address the broader concerns raised by Jean Delvare first.
> > Once I have our i2c adapter to his liking, I can then get the code to
> > yours.
> 
> Are you still planning on cleaning up the i2c stuff at some point?

Still planning on doing so, yes. The cost of reading the EDID every 10s is
irksome.
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre