All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: fix initialization of tags of the huge zero folio with init_on_free
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:32:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeiivYFfC_EfGuFC@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421-zerotags-v2-1-05cb1035482e@kernel.org>

On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 05:39:07PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> __GFP_ZEROTAGS semantics are currently a bit weird, but effectively this
> flag is only ever set alongside __GFP_ZERO and __GFP_SKIP_KASAN.
> 
> If we run with init_on_free, we will zero out pages during
> __free_pages_prepare(), to skip zeroing on the allocation path.
> 
> However, when allocating with __GFP_ZEROTAG set, post_alloc_hook() will
> consequently not only skip clearing page content, but also skip
> clearing tag memory.
> 
> Not clearing tags through __GFP_ZEROTAGS is irrelevant for most pages that
> will get mapped to user space through set_pte_at() later: set_pte_at() and
> friends will detect that the tags have not been initialized yet
> (PG_mte_tagged not set), and initialize them.
> 
> However, for the huge zero folio, which will be mapped through a PMD
> marked as special, this initialization will not be performed, ending up
> exposing whatever tags were still set for the pages.
> 
> The docs (Documentation/arch/arm64/memory-tagging-extension.rst) state
> that allocation tags are set to 0 when a page is first mapped to user
> space. That no longer holds with the huge zero folio when init_on_free
> is enabled.
> 
> Fix it by decoupling __GFP_ZEROTAGS from __GFP_ZERO, passing to
> tag_clear_highpages() whether we want to also clear page content.
> 
> Invert the meaning of the tag_clear_highpages() return value to have
> clearer semantics.
> 
> Reproduced with the huge zero folio by modifying the check_buffer_fill
> arm64/mte selftest to use a 2 MiB area, after making sure that pages have
> a non-0 tag set when freeing (note that, during boot, we will not
> actually initialize tags, but only set KASAN_TAG_KERNEL in the page
> flags).
> 
> 	$ ./check_buffer_fill
> 	1..20
> 	...
> 	not ok 17 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap memory
> 	not ok 18 Check initial tags with private mapping, sync error mode and mmap/mprotect memory
> 	...
> 
> This code needs more cleanups; we'll tackle that next, like
> decoupling __GFP_ZEROTAGS from __GFP_SKIP_KASAN.
> 
> Fixes: adfb6609c680 ("mm/huge_memory: initialise the tags of the huge zero folio")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>

The logic looks fine to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-22 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-21 15:39 [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: fix initialization of tags of the huge zero folio with init_on_free David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-22  2:47 ` Lance Yang
2026-04-22  7:32 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-22 10:32 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeiivYFfC_EfGuFC@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.