All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
To: Salman Alghamdi <me@cipherat.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, luka.gejak@linux.dev,
	straube.linux@gmail.com, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: extract local variables for long expressions
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 12:10:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afB5jnwGX6H5j0PG@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427190548.156499-5-me@cipherat.com>

On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 10:05:32PM +0300, Salman Alghamdi wrote:
> @@ -772,9 +783,14 @@ void rtw_surveydone_event_callback(struct adapter	*adapter, u8 *pbuf)
>  				rtw_indicate_connect(adapter);
>  			} else {
>  				if (rtw_to_roam(adapter) != 0) {
> -					if (rtw_dec_to_roam(adapter) == 0
> -						|| _SUCCESS != rtw_sitesurvey_cmd(adapter, &pmlmepriv->assoc_ssid, 1, NULL, 0)
> -					) {
> +					bool roam_failed = false;
> +
> +					if (rtw_dec_to_roam(adapter) == 0)
> +						roam_failed = true;
> +					else if (rtw_sitesurvey_cmd(adapter, &pmlmepriv->assoc_ssid,
> +								    1, NULL, 0) != _SUCCESS)
> +						roam_failed = true;
> +					if (roam_failed) {

Just write this as:
					if (!rtw_dec_to_roam(adapter) ||
					    rtw_sitesurvey_cmd(adapter, &pmlmepriv->assoc_ssid,
							       1, NULL, 0) != _SUCCESS) {

The "roam_failed" variable isn't beautiful and the if else makes the line
five characters longer than it would be otherwise.  Eventually we'll get
rid of the _SUCCESS but I like it to look ugly so we know which code to
change.

>  						rtw_set_to_roam(adapter, 0);
>  						rtw_free_assoc_resources(adapter, 1);
>  						rtw_indicate_disconnect(adapter);
> @@ -792,8 +808,10 @@ void rtw_surveydone_event_callback(struct adapter	*adapter, u8 *pbuf)
>  			if (check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, WIFI_STATION_STATE)
>  				&& check_fwstate(pmlmepriv, _FW_LINKED)) {
>  				if (rtw_select_roaming_candidate(pmlmepriv) == _SUCCESS) {
> -					receive_disconnect(adapter, pmlmepriv->cur_network.network.mac_address
> -						, WLAN_REASON_ACTIVE_ROAM);
> +					u8 *mac_addr = pmlmepriv->cur_network.network.mac_address;
> +
> +					receive_disconnect(adapter, mac_address,
> +							   WLAN_REASON_ACTIVE_ROAM);
>  				}
>  			}
>  		}
> @@ -1071,6 +1089,7 @@ static void rtw_joinbss_update_network(struct adapter *padapter,
>  {
>  	struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &padapter->mlmepriv;
>  	struct wlan_network  *cur_network = &pmlmepriv->cur_network;
> +	u8 signal_strength = ptarget_wlan->network.phy_info.signal_strength;
>  
>  	/*  why not use ptarget_wlan?? */
>  	memcpy(&cur_network->network, &pnetwork->network, pnetwork->network.length);
> @@ -1082,12 +1101,12 @@ static void rtw_joinbss_update_network(struct adapter *padapter,
>  
>  	rtw_set_signal_stat_timer(&padapter->recvpriv);
>  
> -	padapter->recvpriv.signal_strength = ptarget_wlan->network.phy_info.signal_strength;
> +	padapter->recvpriv.signal_strength = signal_strength;
>  	padapter->recvpriv.signal_qual = ptarget_wlan->network.phy_info.signal_quality;
>  	/* the ptarget_wlan->network.rssi is raw data, we use
>  	 * ptarget_wlan->network.phy_info.signal_strength instead (has scaled)
>  	 */
> -	padapter->recvpriv.rssi = translate_percentage_to_dbm(ptarget_wlan->network.phy_info.signal_strength);
> +	padapter->recvpriv.rssi = translate_percentage_to_dbm(signal_strength);
>  
>  	rtw_set_signal_stat_timer(&padapter->recvpriv);
>  
> @@ -1742,6 +1761,7 @@ static int rtw_check_roaming_candidate(struct mlme_priv *mlme
>  {
>  	int updated = false;
>  	struct adapter *adapter = container_of(mlme, struct adapter, mlmepriv);
> +	long rssi_diff;
>  
>  	if (is_same_ess(&competitor->network, &mlme->cur_network.network) == false)
>  		goto exit;
> @@ -1759,7 +1779,8 @@ static int rtw_check_roaming_candidate(struct mlme_priv *mlme
>  	if (jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - competitor->last_scanned) >= mlme->roam_scanr_exp_ms)
>  		goto exit;
>  
> -	if (competitor->network.rssi - mlme->cur_network_scanned->network.rssi < mlme->roam_rssi_diff_th)
> +	rssi_diff = competitor->network.rssi - mlme->cur_network_scanned->network.rssi;
> +	if (rssi_diff < mlme->roam_rssi_diff_th)
>  		goto exit;
>  
>  	if (*candidate && (*candidate)->network.rssi >= competitor->network.rssi)
> @@ -2133,7 +2154,7 @@ static void rtw_report_sec_ie(struct adapter *adapter, u8 authmode, u8 *sec_ie)
>  
>  		wrqu.data.length = p - buff;
>  
> -		wrqu.data.length = (wrqu.data.length < IW_CUSTOM_MAX) ? wrqu.data.length : IW_CUSTOM_MAX;
> +		wrqu.data.length = umin(wrqu.data.length, IW_CUSTOM_MAX);
>  
>  		kfree(buff);
>  	}
> @@ -2522,13 +2543,14 @@ void rtw_update_ht_cap(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *pie, uint ie_len, u8 channe
>  	    (le16_to_cpu(pmlmeinfo->HT_caps.u.HT_cap_element.HT_caps_info) &
>  	      BIT(1)) && (pmlmeinfo->HT_info.infos[0] & BIT(2))) {
>  		int i;
> +		u8 *mcs_rate = pmlmeinfo->HT_caps.u.HT_cap_element.MCS_rate;

Reverse Christmas tree.

regards,
dan carpenter

>  
>  		/* update the MCS set */
>  		for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> -			pmlmeinfo->HT_caps.u.HT_cap_element.MCS_rate[i] &= pmlmeext->default_supported_mcs_set[i];
> +			mcs_rate[i] &= pmlmeext->default_supported_mcs_set[i];
>  
>  		/* update the MCS rates */
> -		set_mcs_rate_by_mask(pmlmeinfo->HT_caps.u.HT_cap_element.MCS_rate, MCS_RATE_1R);
> +		set_mcs_rate_by_mask(mcs_rate, MCS_RATE_1R);
>  
>  		/* switch to the 40M Hz mode according to the AP */
>  		/* pmlmeext->cur_bwmode = CHANNEL_WIDTH_40; */
> -- 
> 2.54.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-27 19:05 [PATCH v4 0/7] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: fix long lines and related issues Salman Alghamdi
2026-04-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] staging: rtl8723bs: fix buffer over-read in rtw_update_protection Salman Alghamdi
2026-04-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: add bounds checks before ie_length subtraction Salman Alghamdi
2026-04-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: wrap lines exceeding 100 columns Salman Alghamdi
2026-04-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: extract local variables for long expressions Salman Alghamdi
2026-04-28  6:07   ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-28  9:10   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2026-04-28 11:46     ` Salman Alghamdi
2026-04-28 11:55     ` Dan Carpenter
2026-04-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: remove dead commented-out code Salman Alghamdi
2026-04-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: consolidate capability comparisons lines Salman Alghamdi
2026-04-27 19:05 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] staging: rtl8723bs: rtw_mlme: add blank line for readability Salman Alghamdi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afB5jnwGX6H5j0PG@stanley.mountain \
    --to=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=me@cipherat.com \
    --cc=straube.linux@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.