From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Carlos Santa" <carlos.santa@intel.com>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe: Set TTM device beneficial_order to 9 (2M)
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 12:46:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afCP1fmeOUQCEHPX@zenone.zhora.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423055656.1696379-5-matthew.brost@intel.com>
Hi Matt,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 10:56:55PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> Set the TTM device beneficial_order to 9 (2M), which is the sweet
> spot for Xe when attempting reclaim on system memory BOs, as it matches
> the large GPU page size. This ensures reclaim is attempted at the most
> effective order for the driver.
>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Carlos Santa <carlos.santa@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 5:56 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm, drm/ttm, drm/xe: Avoid reclaim/eviction loops under fragmentation Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 5:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: Introduce zone_appears_fragmented() Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 6:04 ` Balbir Singh
2026-04-23 6:16 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 6:27 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 10:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-23 11:27 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-04-23 19:08 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 22:21 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-24 7:05 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-04-24 7:26 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-04-30 2:47 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-30 7:47 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-04-30 16:34 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-30 19:59 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-04-30 17:06 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-04-28 9:51 ` Andi Shyti
2026-04-28 10:05 ` Andi Shyti
2026-04-30 2:34 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-30 2:37 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 5:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/ttm: Issue direct reclaim at beneficial_order Matthew Brost
2026-04-28 9:55 ` Andi Shyti
2026-04-23 5:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/ttm: Introduce ttm_bo_shrink_kswap_fragmented() Matthew Brost
2026-04-28 10:07 ` Andi Shyti
2026-04-30 6:23 ` Matthew Brost
2026-04-30 7:39 ` Christian König
2026-04-23 5:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/xe: Set TTM device beneficial_order to 9 (2M) Matthew Brost
2026-04-28 10:46 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2026-04-23 5:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/xe: Avoid shrinker reclaim from kswapd under fragmentation Matthew Brost
2026-04-23 6:04 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for mm, drm/ttm, drm/xe: Avoid reclaim/eviction loops " Patchwork
2026-04-23 6:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-23 17:30 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afCP1fmeOUQCEHPX@zenone.zhora.eu \
--to=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=carlos.santa@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.