From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: "Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)"
<u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Don't use UTS_RELEASE directly
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:58:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afERYJuuvZmexQ4-@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be82fd356047513f23a3193d8007a2e5e8d97e35@intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 02:09:31PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2026, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > UTS_RELEASE evaluates to a static string and changes quite easily (e.g.
> > uncommitted changes in the source tree or new commits). So when checking
> > if a patch introduces changes to the resulting binary each usage of
> > UTS_RELEASE is source of annoyance.
> >
> > Instead of using UTS_RELEASE directly use init_utsname()->release which
> > evaluates to the same string but with that a change of UTS_RELEASE
> > doesn't affect xe_devcoredump.o.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Jose, ack on this?!
I'm afraid this could break the current Mesa parser, so better checking first...
>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > (implicit) v1 of this patch is available at
> > https://lore.kernel.org/20260427160902.1126027-2-u.kleine-koenig%40baylibre.com.
> >
> > The only changes since then is that instead of dropping the kernel line,
> > init_utsname()->release is used, which is nearly what Jani Nikula
> > suggested.
>
> Almost the same, but better. ;)
>
> I wonder if most UTS_RELEASE uses in the kernel should be changed the
> same way?
>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> >
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> > index 558a1a9841a0..07c7c89240d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_devcoredump.c
> > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/ascii85.h>
> > #include <linux/devcoredump.h>
> > -#include <generated/utsrelease.h>
> > +#include <linux/utsname.h>
> >
> > #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
> >
> > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static ssize_t __xe_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, ssize_t count,
> >
> > drm_puts(&p, "**** Xe Device Coredump ****\n");
> > drm_printf(&p, "Reason: %s\n", ss->reason);
> > - drm_puts(&p, "kernel: " UTS_RELEASE "\n");
> > + drm_printf(&p, "kernel: %s\n", init_utsname()->release);
> > drm_puts(&p, "module: " KBUILD_MODNAME "\n");
> >
> > ts = ktime_to_timespec64(ss->snapshot_time);
> >
> > base-commit: 254f49634ee16a731174d2ae34bc50bd5f45e731
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-28 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 10:25 [PATCH v2] drm/xe: Don't use UTS_RELEASE directly Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
2026-04-28 11:09 ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-28 13:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
2026-04-28 19:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2026-04-28 20:01 ` Souza, Jose
2026-04-28 20:21 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-04-30 19:00 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afERYJuuvZmexQ4-@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.