From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Gao Chao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fall back to IRR scan when PIR is empty despite PID.ON being set
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 05:58:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afIAixCQqJNYWLBK@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0dacbe06-5b97-4dee-b8f2-a235b70448e2@intel.com>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> On 4/28/2026 11:50 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> >> On 4/28/2026 3:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> On 4/28/26 09:03, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> >>>> The interrupt is not lost (it resides in the IRR from the first sync and
> >>>> is recovered on the next vcpu_enter_guest() iteration), but the incorrect
> >>>> max_irr causes a spurious WARNING and a wasted L2 VM-Enter/VM-Exit cycle.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: b41f8638b9d3 ("KVM: VMX: Isolate pure loads from atomic XCHG when processing PIR")
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >
> >>>> Reported-by: Farrah Chen <farrah.chen@intel.com>
> >>>> Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:Claude Opus 4.6
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> There is a WARNING call trace during a nested VM stress test.
> >
> > Any chance the stress test is something that can be shared? I've seen this WARN
> > 2-3 times over the last year, but it was never reproducible, and so intermittent
> > that I couldn't even correlate what I was doing at the time with the WARN.
>
> It's not something special. The stress test is only to create and tear down
> 20 nested VM instance in a cycle. It often takes more than 20 cycles to
> reproduce this issue.
Got it, thanks much!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-28 7:03 [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fall back to IRR scan when PIR is empty despite PID.ON being set Chenyi Qiang
2026-04-28 7:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-04-28 8:27 ` Chenyi Qiang
2026-04-28 15:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-29 1:08 ` Chenyi Qiang
2026-04-29 12:58 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-04-28 11:10 ` Chao Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afIAixCQqJNYWLBK@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=farrah.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.