From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: HACKE-RC <rc@rexion.ai>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] netfilter: conntrack: validate parsed port values in IRC and Amanda helpers
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 18:18:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afOAw3V2PAKy1gPJ@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430161230.3438973-1-rc@rexion.ai>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 09:42:28PM +0530, HACKE-RC wrote:
> Both nf_conntrack_irc and nf_conntrack_amanda parse port numbers from
> application-layer protocol data using simple_strtoul(), which returns
> unsigned long. The results are stored in u16 variables without range
> checks, silently truncating values above 65535.
>
> This series adds explicit upper-bound validation in both helpers.
>
> Note: checkpatch warns about simple_strtoul being obsolete. Both
> call sites use the endptr output parameter to advance the parse
> position, which kstrtoul does not provide. Converting to kstrtoul
> would require restructuring the parsers, which is out of scope for
> this fix.
>
> HACKE-RC (2):
HAHA, this nickname is funny, it is making my day here. Thanks!
> netfilter: nf_conntrack_irc: reject DCC port values above 65535
> netfilter: nf_conntrack_amanda: reject port values above 65535
>
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_amanda.c | 10 ++++++----
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_irc.c | 7 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 16:12 [PATCH net-next 0/2] netfilter: conntrack: validate parsed port values in IRC and Amanda helpers HACKE-RC
2026-04-30 16:12 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] netfilter: nf_conntrack_irc: reject DCC port values above 65535 HACKE-RC
2026-04-30 16:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afOAw3V2PAKy1gPJ@chamomile \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=rc@rexion.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.