From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] i2c: testunit: Replace system_long_wq with system_dfl_long_wq
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 10:02:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afhSs8h6Jrnbk37h@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430090810.109232-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1966 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 11:08:10AM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote:
> Currently the code enqueue work items using {queue|mod}_delayed_work(),
> using system_long_wq. This workqueue should be used when long works are
> expected, but it is a per-cpu workqueue.
>
> This is important because queue_delayed_work() queue the work using:
>
> queue_delayed_work_on(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, ...);
>
> Note that WORK_CPU_UNBOUND = NR_CPUS.
>
> This would end up calling __queue_delayed_work() that does:
>
> if (housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_TIMER)) {
> // [....]
> } else {
> if (likely(cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND))
> add_timer_global(timer);
> else
> add_timer_on(timer, cpu);
> }
>
> So when cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND the timer is global and is
> not using a specific CPU. Later, when __queue_work() is called:
>
> if (req_cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND) {
> if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)
> cpu = wq_select_unbound_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id());
> else
> cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> }
>
> Because the wq is not unbound, it takes the CPU where the timer
> fired and enqueue the work on that CPU.
> The consequence of all of this is that the work can run anywhere,
> depending on where the timer fired.
>
> Recently, a new unbound workqueue specific for long running work has
> been added:
>
> c116737e972e ("workqueue: Add system_dfl_long_wq for long unbound works")
>
> So change system_long_wq with system_dfl_long_wq so that the work may
> benefit from scheduler task placement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Looks very reasonable to me. With your detailed explanation, we could
probably also remove the FIXME next to the workqueue.h-include. This
seems to be the proper workqueue now. I will fix it when applying.
Thank you!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 9:08 [RFC PATCH] i2c: testunit: Replace system_long_wq with system_dfl_long_wq Marco Crivellari
2026-05-04 8:02 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-05-04 8:07 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-05-04 8:30 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afhSs8h6Jrnbk37h@ninjato \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.