From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix ATS state tracking via ats_prepared gate
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 14:29:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ag3FX2rYHybhv7bZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agy2uGGC6wXhG91Z@google.com>
On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 08:01:55PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 11:59:47AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 02:55:54PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 11:44:30AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 19, 2026 at 01:53:22PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > > > > @@ -4450,7 +4450,8 @@ static struct iommu_device *arm_smmu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> > > > > if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> > > > > unsigned int stu = __ffs(smmu->pgsize_bitmap);
> > > > >
> > > > > - pci_prepare_ats(to_pci_dev(dev), stu);
> > > > > + if (!pci_prepare_ats(to_pci_dev(dev), stu))
> > > > > + master->ats_prepared = true;
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > This should fail not keep going, it is a kernel bug if
> > > > pci_prepare_ats() fails.
>
> I agree with this approach, as it captures the bug at right place and we
> can fix it. This maybe changes the simantics of prepare_ats(), but I
> agreed with this.
> > >
> > > Are you suggesting it's a kernel bug if the STU doesn't match?
> > > IIUC, it can fail because of the following cases (including the PF STU):
> > >
> > > if (!pci_ats_supported(dev))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > It should not be called if ats is not supported, iommu driver bug.
>
> So basically iommu drivers should call pci_ats_supported(dev) before
> calling prepare_ats() and probe fails if prepare_ats() fails.
Ack. I'll add those checks to Intel and AMD IOMMU too..
AFAICT, both of those too, don't fail an attach if pci_enable_ats fails
[1][2]. I'll add those in the next version as well.
Thanks,
Praan
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc3/source/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c#L2373
[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1-rc3/source/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c#L3340
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 13:53 [PATCH v3 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix ATS robustness and state tracking Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-19 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI/ATS: Ensure pci_ats_supported() is PF-aware for VFs Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-19 14:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-19 19:02 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-19 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] PCI/ATS: Validate STU for VFs in pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-19 14:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-19 19:05 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-19 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix ATS state tracking via ats_prepared gate Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-19 14:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-19 14:55 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-19 14:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-19 20:01 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-05-20 14:29 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-05-20 14:24 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-20 14:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-20 16:24 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-20 16:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-22 16:14 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-23 12:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-25 18:38 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ag3FX2rYHybhv7bZ@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=danielmentz@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.